Computerized detection of breast tissue asymmetry depicted on bilateral mammograms: a preliminary study of breast risk stratification
- PMID: 20619697
- PMCID: PMC2939253
- DOI: 10.1016/j.acra.2010.05.016
Computerized detection of breast tissue asymmetry depicted on bilateral mammograms: a preliminary study of breast risk stratification
Abstract
Rationale and objectives: Assessment of the breast tissue pattern asymmetry depicted on bilateral mammograms is routinely used by radiologists when reading and interpreting mammograms. The purpose of this study is to develop an automated scheme to detect breast tissue asymmetry depicted on bilateral mammograms and use the computed asymmetric features to predict the likelihood (or the risk) of women having or developing breast abnormalities or cancer.
Materials and methods: A testing dataset was selected from a large and diverse full-field digital mammography image database, which includes 100 randomly selected negative cases (not recalled during the screening) and 100 positive cases for having or developing breast abnormalities or cancer. Among these positive cases 40 were recalled (biopsy) because of suspicious findings in which 8 were determined as high risk with the lesions surgically removed and the remaining were proven to be benign, and 60 cases were acquired from examinations that were interpreted as negative (without dominant masses or microcalcifications) but the cancers were detected 6-18 months later. A computerized scheme was developed to detect asymmetry of mammographic tissue density represented by the related feature differences computed from bilateral images. Initially, each of 20 features was tested to classify between the positive and the negative cases. To further improve the classification performance, a genetic algorithm (GA) was applied to select a set of optimal features and build an artificial neural network (ANN). The leave-one-case-out validation method was used to evaluate the ANN classification performance.
Results: Using a single feature, the maximum classification performance level measured by the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) was 0.681 ± 0.038. Using the GA-optimized ANN, the classification performance level increased to an AUC = 0.754 ± 0.024. At 90% specificity, the ANN classifier yielded 42% sensitivity, in which 42 positive cases were correctly identified. Among them, 30 were the "prior" examinations of the cancer cases and 12 were recalled benign cases, which represent 50% and 30% sensitivity levels in these two subgroups, respectively.
Conclusions: This study demonstrated that using the computerized detected feature differences related to the bilateral mammographic breast tissue asymmetry, an automated scheme is able to classify a set of testing cases into the two groups of positive or negative of having or developing breast abnormalities or cancer. Hence, further development and optimization of this automated method may eventually help radiologists identify a fraction of women at high risk of developing breast cancer and ultimately detect cancer at an early stage.
Copyright © 2010 AUR. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Similar articles
-
Improving performance of computer-aided detection of masses by incorporating bilateral mammographic density asymmetry: an assessment.Acad Radiol. 2012 Mar;19(3):303-10. doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2011.10.026. Epub 2011 Dec 14. Acad Radiol. 2012. PMID: 22173323 Free PMC article.
-
Improving performance of computer-aided detection scheme by combining results from two machine learning classifiers.Acad Radiol. 2009 Mar;16(3):266-74. doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2008.08.012. Acad Radiol. 2009. PMID: 19201355 Free PMC article.
-
Prediction of near-term risk of developing breast cancer using computerized features from bilateral mammograms.Comput Med Imaging Graph. 2014 Jul;38(5):348-57. doi: 10.1016/j.compmedimag.2014.03.001. Epub 2014 Mar 13. Comput Med Imaging Graph. 2014. PMID: 24725671
-
CADx of mammographic masses and clustered microcalcifications: a review.Med Phys. 2009 Jun;36(6):2052-68. doi: 10.1118/1.3121511. Med Phys. 2009. PMID: 19610294 Review.
-
A review of automatic mass detection and segmentation in mammographic images.Med Image Anal. 2010 Apr;14(2):87-110. doi: 10.1016/j.media.2009.12.005. Epub 2009 Dec 29. Med Image Anal. 2010. PMID: 20071209 Review.
Cited by
-
Quantification of Regional Breast Density in Four Quadrants Using 3D MRI-A Pilot Study.Transl Oncol. 2015 Aug;8(4):250-7. doi: 10.1016/j.tranon.2015.04.005. Transl Oncol. 2015. PMID: 26310370 Free PMC article.
-
Dense breasts and women's health: which screenings are essential?Clinics (Sao Paulo). 2025 Aug 9;80:100743. doi: 10.1016/j.clinsp.2025.100743. Online ahead of print. Clinics (Sao Paulo). 2025. PMID: 40784179 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Beyond breast density: a review on the advancing role of parenchymal texture analysis in breast cancer risk assessment.Breast Cancer Res. 2016 Sep 20;18(1):91. doi: 10.1186/s13058-016-0755-8. Breast Cancer Res. 2016. PMID: 27645219 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Automated volumetric breast density measures: differential change between breasts in women with and without breast cancer.Breast Cancer Res. 2019 Oct 28;21(1):118. doi: 10.1186/s13058-019-1198-9. Breast Cancer Res. 2019. PMID: 31660981 Free PMC article.
-
Bilateral mammographic density asymmetry and breast cancer risk: a preliminary assessment.Eur J Radiol. 2012 Nov;81(11):3222-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2012.04.018. Epub 2012 May 12. Eur J Radiol. 2012. PMID: 22579527 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Wolfe JN. Breast patterns as an index of risk for developing breast cancer. Am J Roentgenol. 1976;126:1130–1139. - PubMed
-
- Boyd NF, Martin IJ, Stone J, et al. Mammographic densities as a marker of human breast cancer risk and their use in chemoprevention. Curr Oncol Rep. 2001;3:314–321. - PubMed
-
- BI-RADS Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System Breast Imaging Atlas. American College of Radiology; Reston, VA: 2003.
-
- Wolfe JN, Saftlas AF, Salane M. Mammographic parenchymal patterns and quantitative evaluation of mammographic densities: A case-control study. Am J Roentgenol. 1987;148:1087–1092. - PubMed
-
- Byng JW, Yaffe MJ, Lockwood LE, et al. Automated analysis of mammographic densities and breast carcinoma risk. Cancer. 1997;80:66–74. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical