Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2010 Oct;76(2):97-102.
doi: 10.1016/j.jhin.2010.04.027.

Adverse effects of isolation in hospitalised patients: a systematic review

Affiliations

Adverse effects of isolation in hospitalised patients: a systematic review

C Abad et al. J Hosp Infect. 2010 Oct.

Abstract

The use of transmission precautions such as contact isolation in patients known to be colonised or infected with multidrug-resistant organisms is recommended in healthcare institutions. Although essential for infection control, contact isolation has recently been associated with adverse effects in patients. We undertook a systematic review to determine whether contact isolation leads to psychological or physical problems for patients. Studies were included if (1) hospitalised patients were placed under isolation precautions for an underlying medical indication, and (2) any adverse events related to the isolation were evaluated. We found 16 studies that reported data regarding the impact of isolation on patient mental well-being, patient satisfaction, patient safety or time spent by healthcare workers in direct patient care. The majority showed a negative impact on patient mental well-being and behaviour, including higher scores for depression, anxiety and anger among isolated patients. A few studies also found that healthcare workers spent less time with patients in isolation. Patient satisfaction was adversely affected by isolation if patients were kept uninformed of their healthcare. Patient safety was also negatively affected, leading to an eight-fold increase in adverse events related to supportive care failures. We found that contact isolation may negatively impact several dimensions of patient care. Well-validated tools are necessary to investigate these results further. Large studies examining a number of safety indicators to assess the adverse effects of isolation are needed. Patient education may be an important step to mitigate the adverse psychological effects of isolation and is recommended.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Literature search process.

Comment in

References

    1. Evans H.L., Shaffer M.M., Hughes M.G. Contact isolation in surgical patients: a barrier to care? Surgery. 2003;134:180–188. - PubMed
    1. Siegel J., Rhinehart E., Jackson M., Chiarello L. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; Atlanta: 2006. Management of multidrug-resistant organisms in healthcare settings. pp. 1–72.
    1. Koss W.G., Khalili T.M., Lemus J.F., Chelly M.M., Margulies D.R., Shabot M.M. Nosocomial pneumonia is not prevented by protective contact isolation in the surgical intensive care unit. Am Surg. 2001;67:1140–1144. - PubMed
    1. Saint S., Higgins L.A., Nallamothu B.K., Chenoweth C. Do physicians examine patients in contact isolation less frequently? A brief report. Am J Infect Control. 2003;31:354–356. - PubMed
    1. Kirkland K.B., Weinstein J.M. Adverse effects of contact isolation. Lancet. 1999;354:1177–1178. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms