Cardiac performance measure compliance in outpatients: the American College of Cardiology and National Cardiovascular Data Registry's PINNACLE (Practice Innovation And Clinical Excellence) program
- PMID: 20620710
- PMCID: PMC2922046
- DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2010.03.043
Cardiac performance measure compliance in outpatients: the American College of Cardiology and National Cardiovascular Data Registry's PINNACLE (Practice Innovation And Clinical Excellence) program
Abstract
Objectives: We examined compliance with performance measures for 14,464 patients enrolled from July 2008 through June 2009 into the American College of Cardiology's PINNACLE (Practice Innovation And Clinical Excellence) program to provide initial insights into the quality of outpatient cardiac care.
Background: Little is known about the quality of care of outpatients with coronary artery disease (CAD), heart failure, and atrial fibrillation, and whether sex and racial disparities exist in the treatment of outpatients.
Methods: The PINNACLE program is the first, national, prospective office-based quality improvement program of cardiac patients designed, in part, to capture, report, and improve outpatient performance measure compliance. We examined the proportion of patients whose care was compliant with established American College of Cardiology, American Heart Association, and American Medical Association-Physician Consortium for Performance Improvement (ACC/AHA/PCPI) performance measures for CAD, heart failure, and atrial fibrillation.
Results: There were 14,464 unique patients enrolled from 27 U.S. practices, accounting for 18,021 clinical visits. Of these, 8,132 (56.4%) had CAD, 5,012 (34.7%) had heart failure, and 2,786 (19.3%) had nonvalvular atrial fibrillation. Data from the PINNACLE program were feasibly collected for 24 of 25 ACC/AHA/PCPI performance measures. Compliance with performance measures ranged from being very low (e.g., 13.3% of CAD patients screened for diabetes mellitus) to very high (e.g., 96.7% of heart failure patients with blood pressure assessments), with moderate (70% to 90%) compliance observed for most performance measures. For 3 performance measures, there were small differences in compliance rates by race or sex.
Conclusions: For more than 14,000 patients enrolled from 27 practices in the outpatient PINNACLE program, we found that compliance with performance measures was variable, even after accounting for exclusion criteria, suggesting an important opportunity to improve the quality of outpatient care.
Copyright (c) 2010 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Comment in
-
Scaling new heights in quality improvement: the PINNACLE (Practice Innovation And Clinical Excellence) program.J Am Coll Cardiol. 2010 Jun 29;56(1):15-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2010.05.003. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2010. PMID: 20620711 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Cardiovascular Disease Performance Measures in the Outpatient Setting in India: Insights From the American College of Cardiology's PINNACLE India Quality Improvement Program (PIQIP).J Am Heart Assoc. 2015 May 20;4(5):e001910. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.115.001910. J Am Heart Assoc. 2015. PMID: 25994444 Free PMC article.
-
Practitioner Gender and Quality of Care in Ambulatory Cardiology Practices: A Report From the National Cardiovascular Data Practice Innovation and Clinical Excellence (PINNACLE) Registry.J Cardiovasc Nurs. 2018 May/Jun;33(3):255-260. doi: 10.1097/JCN.0000000000000443. J Cardiovasc Nurs. 2018. PMID: 28816774 Free PMC article.
-
Electronic health records and outpatient cardiovascular disease care delivery: Insights from the American College of Cardiology's PINNACLE India Quality Improvement Program (PIQIP).Indian Heart J. 2018 Sep-Oct;70(5):750-752. doi: 10.1016/j.ihj.2018.03.002. Epub 2018 Mar 7. Indian Heart J. 2018. PMID: 30392517 Free PMC article.
-
2022 AHA/ACC/HFSA Guideline for the Management of Heart Failure: Executive Summary: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines.Circulation. 2022 May 3;145(18):e876-e894. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000001062. Epub 2022 Apr 1. Circulation. 2022. PMID: 35363500 Review.
-
American College of Cardiology (ACC)'s PINNACLE India Quality Improvement Program (PIQIP)-Inception, progress and future direction: A report from the PIQIP Investigators.Indian Heart J. 2016 Dec;68 Suppl 3(Suppl 3):S1-S4. doi: 10.1016/j.ihj.2016.09.005. Epub 2016 Sep 20. Indian Heart J. 2016. PMID: 28038717 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Association of Outpatient Practice-Level Socioeconomic Disadvantage With Quality of Care and Outcomes Among Older Adults With Coronary Artery Disease: Implications for Value-Based Payment.Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2020 Apr;13(4):e005977. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.119.005977. Epub 2020 Mar 31. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2020. PMID: 32228065 Free PMC article.
-
Toward a Universal Definition of Etiologies in Heart Failure: Categorizing Causes and Advancing Registry Science.Circ Heart Fail. 2024 Apr;17(4):e011095. doi: 10.1161/CIRCHEARTFAILURE.123.011095. Epub 2024 Apr 16. Circ Heart Fail. 2024. PMID: 38626067 Free PMC article. Review.
-
The role of systematic inpatient cardiac rehabilitation referral in increasing equitable access and utilization.J Cardiopulm Rehabil Prev. 2012 Jan-Feb;32(1):41-7. doi: 10.1097/HCR.0b013e31823be13b. J Cardiopulm Rehabil Prev. 2012. PMID: 22193933 Free PMC article.
-
Differences in anticoagulant therapy prescription in patients with paroxysmal versus persistent atrial fibrillation.Am J Med. 2015 Jun;128(6):654.e1-654.e10. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2014.11.035. Epub 2014 Dec 29. Am J Med. 2015. PMID: 25554371 Free PMC article.
-
Roadmap to a more useful and usable electronic health record.Cardiovasc Digit Health J. 2021 Oct 9;2(6):301-311. doi: 10.1016/j.cvdhj.2021.09.007. eCollection 2021 Dec. Cardiovasc Digit Health J. 2021. PMID: 35265926 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Spertus JA, Eagle KA, Krumholz HM, Mitchell KR, Normand SL. American College of Cardiology and American Heart Association methodology for the selection and creation of performance measures for quantifying the quality of cardiovascular care. Circulation. 2005;111:1703–1712. - PubMed
-
- Bonow RO, Masoudi FA, Rumsfeld JS, et al. ACC/AHA classification of care metrics: performance measures and quality metrics: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Performance Measures. Circulation. 2008;118:2662–2666. - PubMed
-
- Clinical Performance Measures: Chronic Stable Coronary Artery Disease. American College of Cardiology and American Heart Association. http://acc.org/qualityandscience/clinical/measures/CAD/cadmeasures.pdf.
-
- Bonow RO, Bennett S, Casey DE, Jr, et al. ACC/AHA Clinical Performance Measures for Adults with Chronic Heart Failure: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Performance Measures (Writing Committee to Develop Heart Failure Clinical Performance Measures): endorsed by the Heart Failure Society of America. Circulation. 2005;112:1853–1887. - PubMed
-
- Estes NA, 3rd, Halperin JL, Calkins H, et al. ACC/AHA/Physician Consortium 2008 clinical performance measures for adults with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation or atrial flutter: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Performance Measures and the Physician Consortium for Performance Improvement (Writing Committee to Develop Clinical Performance Measures for Atrial Fibrillation): developed in collaboration with the Heart Rhythm Society. Circulation. 2008;117:1101–1120. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous