Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2010 May;7(5):2033-44.
doi: 10.3390/ijerph7052033. Epub 2010 Apr 28.

Perturbation of the developmental potential of preimplantation mouse embryos by hydroxyurea

Affiliations

Perturbation of the developmental potential of preimplantation mouse embryos by hydroxyurea

Mariam Sampson et al. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2010 May.

Abstract

Women are advised not to attempt pregnancy while on hydroxyurea (HU) due to the teratogenic effects of this agent, based on results obtained from animal studies. Several case reports suggest that HU may have minimal or no teratogenic effects on the developing human fetus. Fourteen cases of HU therapy in pregnant patients diagnosed with acute or chronic myelogenous leukemia, primary thrombocythemia, or sickle cell disease (SCD) have been reported. Three pregnancies were terminated by elective abortion; 1 woman developed eclampsia and delivered a phenotypically normal stillborn infant. All other patients delivered live, healthy infants without congenital anomalies. We contend that case studies such as these have too few patients and cannot effectively address the adverse effect of HU on preimplantation embryo or fetuses. The objective of this study was to assess the risks associated with a clinically relevant dose of HU used for the treatment of SCD, on ovulation rate and embryo development, using adult C57BL/6J female mice as a model. In Experiment 1, adult female mice were randomly assigned to a treatment or a control group (N = 20/group). Treatment consisted of oral HU (30 mg/kg) for 28 days; while control mice received saline (HU vehicle). Five days to the cessation of HU dosing, all mice were subjected to folliculogenesis induction with pregnant mare serum gonadotropin (PMSG). Five mice/group were anesthetized at 48 hours post PMSG to facilitate blood collection via cardiac puncture for estradiol-17beta (E(2)) measurement by RIA. Ovulation was induced in the remaining mice at 48 hours post PMSG with human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) and immediately caged with adult males for mating. Five plugged female mice/group were sacrificed for the determination of ovulation rate. The remaining mated mice were sacrificed about 26 hours post hCG, ovaries excised and weighed and embryos harvested and cultured in Whitten's medium (WM) supplemented with CZBt. In Experiments 2 and 3, (N = 10/Experiment) folliculogenesis and ovulation were induced in untreated mice followed by mating. Recovered embryos were either exposed continuously (Experiment 2) or intermittently (Experiment 3) to bioavailable HU (18 microg HU/mL of WM + CZBt) or WM + CZBt only (control). Treated mice sustained decreased ovarian wt, ovulation rate and circulating E(2) compared with controls (P < 0.05). Fewer embryos retrieved from HU-treated mice developed to blastocyst stage (32%) compared with those from controls (60%; P < 0.05). Furthermore, continuous or intermittent in vitro exposures of embryos to HU also resulted in reduced development to blastocyst stage (continuous HU, 9 vs. control, 63%; P < 0.05; intermittent HU, 20 vs. control, 62%; P < 0.05) with embryos exposed continuously to HU in vitro fairing worse. Even though HU is well tolerated, our data suggest that it compromises folliculogenesis and the ability of generated embryos to develop. Therefore, designed studies with larger numbers of patients receiving HU during pregnancy, with longer follow-up of exposed children and more careful assessment of embryo/fetotoxic effects, are required before this agent can be promoted as safe in pregnancy.

Keywords: 2-cell embryo; blastocyst; estradiol-17β ovulation rate; hydroxyurea; ovarian weight.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Normal 2-cell embryo with two equal blastomeres (B), one of two polar bodies (PB) encompassed by an intact zona pellucida (ZP; magnification = 400X).
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Mean Ovarian Weight of HU-treated Versus Control Mice.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
Effect of HU on Serum E2 Concentrations in Female Mice Treated IP with 30 mg HU/kg for 28 days; n = 5 per Group. Results are expressed as mean ± SE (HU = treated mice; Control = vehicle treated mice. Asterisks indicate a significant difference from controls (P < 0.05).
Figure 4.
Figure 4.
Effect of HU on Ovulation Rate in Female Mice Treated IP with 30 mg HU/kg for 28 days; n = 5 per Group. Results are expressed as mean ± SE (HU = treated mice; Control = vehicle treated mice. Asterisks indicate a significant difference from controls (P < 0.05).
Figure 5.
Figure 5.
Effect of in vivo Exposure of Embryos to HU on Their Ability to Develop to Blastocyst Stage; n = 60 per Group. Results are expressed in percentages (HU = treated mice; Control = vehicle treated mice. Asterisks indicate a significant difference from controls (P < 0.05).
Figure 6.
Figure 6.
Photomicrograph of a blastocyst with an outer cell mass (OCM), inner cell mass (ICM) encompassed by an intact zona pellucida (ZP; Magnification = 400X).
Figure 7.
Figure 7.
Effect of Continuous in vitro Exposure of Embryos to Bioavailable HU (18 μg/mL) on Their Ability to Develop to Blastocyst Stage; n = 50 per Group. Results are expressed in percentages (HU = treated embryos; Control = vehicle treated embryos. Asterisks indicate a significant difference from controls (P < 0.05).
Figure 8.
Figure 8.
Effect of Intermittent in vitro Exposure of Embryos to Bioavailable HU (18 μg/mL) on Their Ability to Develop to Blastocyst Stage; n = 60 per Group. Results are expressed in percentages (HU = treated embryos; Control = vehicle treated embryos. Asterisks indicate a significant difference from controls (P < 0.05).

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Yarbro JW. Mechanism of action of hydroxyurea. Semin. Oncol. 1992;19:1–10. - PubMed
    1. Caramazza D, Caracciolo C, Barone R, Malato A, Saccullo G, Cigna V, Berretta S, Schinocca L, Quintini G, Abbadessa V, Di Raimondo F, Siragusa S. Correlation between leukocytosis and thrombosis in Philadelphia-negative chronic myeloprolipherative neoplasm. Ann. Hematol. 2009;88:967–971. - PubMed
    1. Cortelazzo S, Finazzi G, Ruggeri M, Vestri O, Galli M, Rodeghiero F, Barbui T. Hydroxyurea for patients with essential thrombocythemia and a high risk of thrombosis. N. Engl. J. Med. 1995;332:1132–1136. - PubMed
    1. Silver RT, Woolf SH, Hehlmann R, Appelbaum FR, Anderson J, Bennett C, Goldman JM, Guilhot F, Kantarjian HM, Lichtin AE, Talpaz M, Tura S. An evidence-based analysis of the effect of busulfan,hydroxyurea, interferon, and allogeneic bone marrow transplantation in treating the chronic phase of chronic myeloid leukemia: developed for the American Society of Hematology. Blood. 1999;94:1517–1536. - PubMed
    1. Steinberg MH. Management of sickle cell disease. N. Engl. J. Med. 1999;340:1021–1030. - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources