Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2010 Oct;468(10):2621-6.
doi: 10.1007/s11999-010-1387-4.

Orthopaedic literature and MeSH

Stuart J Nelson  1 , Jacque-Lynne Schulman
Affiliations
Review

Orthopaedic literature and MeSH

Stuart J Nelson et al. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2010 Oct.

Abstract

Background: Since 1916 there has been a recognized demand for a method of classification of orthopaedic literature inclusive enough to permit the proper collection and retrieval of all literature on the subject. Today, MEDLINE, available through the PubMed interface, has become the de facto standard for organization and retrieval of medical literature. The Medical Subject Headings (MeSH), used to provide indexing and assist in searching, are partly responsible for this standard. Understanding how MeSH is built and maintained may lead the user to a better understanding of how to use MEDLINE, and what to expect from the indexing of an article.

Questions/purposes: The purpose of this review is to provide an understanding of the organization of large quantities of indexed material, the indexing process and the considerations involved in developing an indexing vocabulary. WHERE ARE WE NOW?: Successful terminology development and use, a prerequisite for any sharing of information by electronic means, depends on both user (how the user is expected to use the system) and information (how the information is organized) models. MEDLINE has a simple user model and a simpler information model. The user is expected to determine what is relevant and which MeSH descriptors are appropriate. WHERE DO WE NEED TO GO?: While MEDLINE through PubMed is a success as viewed by the number of hits, further improvements will depend on better, faster indexing with a controlled terminology. Terminology development requires careful consideration of the nature of the subject, how users employ the terminology, the overall purpose of the terminology, and the framework of the systems in which it is used. HOW DO WE GET THERE?: For the future, understanding terminology development might enable the user to comprehend some of the issues involved in sharing of other information by electronic means. Further improvements in the availability and accessibility of medical literature will depend on continued maintenance and development of MeSH, as well as on refinement of the indexing process.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
The chart shows an increase in the number of citations indexed per year by MEDLINE.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
The orthopaedic procedure hierarchy is shown.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. Aronson AR, Bodenreider O, Chang HF, Humphrey SM, Mork JG, Nelson SJ, Rindflesch TC, Wilbur WJ. The NLM Indexing Initiative. Proc AMIA Symp. 2000:17–21. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Aronson AR, Mork JG, Gay CW, Humphrey SM, Rogers WJ. The NLM Indexing Initiative’s Medical Text Indexer. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2004;107(Pt 1):268–272. - PubMed
    1. Barnett O. Assisting health professions education through information technology. Past, Present, and Future of Biomedical Information. Bethesda, MD: National Library of Medicine; 1987. NIH Publication No 88-2911, pp 88–103.
    1. Classification of orthopedic literature. Am J Orthop Surg. 1916;14:613–617.
    1. Gay CW, Kayaalp M, Aronson AR. Semi-automatic indexing of full text biomedical articles. AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2005:271–275. - PMC - PubMed