"Evidence" in chronic pain--establishing best practice in the reporting of systematic reviews
- PMID: 20627575
- DOI: 10.1016/j.pain.2010.05.011
"Evidence" in chronic pain--establishing best practice in the reporting of systematic reviews
References
-
- Beunckens C, Molenberghs G, Kenward MG. Direct likelihood analysis versus simple forms of imputation for missing data in randomized clinical trials. Clin Trials. 2005;2:379-386.
-
- Breivik H, Collett B, Ventafridda V, Cohen R, Gallacher D. Survey of chronic pain in Europe: prevalence, impact on daily life, and treatment. Eur J Pain. 2006;10:287-333.
-
- Carroll D, Tramèr M, McQuay H, Nye B, Moore A. Randomization is important in studies with pain outcomes: systematic review of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation in acute postoperative pain. Br J Anaesth. 1996;77:798-803.
-
- Collins SL, Moore RA, McQuay HJ. The visual analogue pain intensity scale: what is moderate pain in millimetres? Pain. 1997;72:95-97.
-
- Counsell CE, Clarke MJ, Slattery J, Sandercock PA. The miracle of DICE therapy for acute stroke: fact or fictional product of subgroup analysis? BMJ. 1994;309:1677-1681.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical