Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2010 Oct;33(10):2190-5.
doi: 10.2337/dc10-0752. Epub 2010 Jul 13.

Impact of A1C screening criterion on the diagnosis of pre-diabetes among U.S. adults

Devin M Mann  1 , April P Carson, Daichi Shimbo, Vivian Fonseca, Caroline S Fox, Paul Muntner
Affiliations

Impact of A1C screening criterion on the diagnosis of pre-diabetes among U.S. adults

Devin M Mann et al. Diabetes Care. 2010 Oct.

Abstract

Objective: New clinical practice recommendations include A1C as an alternative to fasting glucose as a diagnostic test for identifying pre-diabetes. The impact of these new recommendations on the diagnosis of pre-diabetes is unknown.

Research design and methods: Data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 1999-2006 (n = 7,029) were analyzed to determine the percentage and number of U.S. adults without diabetes classified as having pre-diabetes by the elevated A1C (5.7-6.4%) and by the impaired fasting glucose (IFG) (fasting glucose 100-125 mg/dl) criterion separately. Test characteristics (sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values) using IFG as the reference standard were calculated.

Results: The prevalence of pre-diabetes among U.S. adults was 12.6% by the A1C criterion and 28.2% by the fasting glucose criterion. Only 7.7% of U.S. adults, reflecting 61 and 27% of those with pre-diabetes by A1C and fasting glucose, respectively, had pre-diabetes according to both definitions. A1C used alone would reclassify 37.6 million Americans with IFG to not having pre-diabetes and 8.9 million without IFG to having pre-diabetes (46.5 million reclassified). Using IFG as the reference standard, pre-diabetes by the A1C criterion has 27% sensitivity, 93% specificity, 61% positive predictive value, and 77% negative predictive value.

Conclusions: Using A1C as the pre-diabetes criterion would reclassify the pre-diabetes diagnosis of nearly 50 million Americans. It is imperative that clinicians and health systems understand the differences and similarities in using A1C or IFG in diagnosis of pre-diabetes.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Overlap of pre-diabetes by IFG and A1C among U.S. adults without diabetes. %, percentage of U.S. adults. IFG, FPG of 100–125 mg/dl; M, million.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Comment in

References

    1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention National Diabetes Fact Sheet: General Information and National Estimates on Diabetes in the United States, 2007. Atlanta, GA, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2008
    1. American Diabetes Association Economic costs of diabetes in the U.S. in 2007. Diabetes Care 2008; 31: 596– 615 - PubMed
    1. Narayan KM, Williamson DF: Prevention of type 2 diabetes: risk status, clinic, and community. J Gen Intern Med 2010; 25: 154– 157 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Viswanath A, Pereira O, Philip S, Mchardy K: Diagnosing diabetes mellitus: contemporary use of the oral glucose tolerance test in a regional diabetes centre. Pract Diabetes Int 2006; 23: 287– 290
    1. American Diabetes Association Standards of medical care in diabetes—2010. Diabetes Care 2010; 33: S11– S61 - PMC - PubMed