Factors impacting quality of life in women with fecal incontinence
- PMID: 20628278
- PMCID: PMC2906823
- DOI: 10.1007/DCR.0b013e3181d5da6c
Factors impacting quality of life in women with fecal incontinence
Abstract
Purpose: The aim of this study was to characterize differences in health-related quality of life among women presenting for treatment of fecal incontinence.
Methods: Among 155 women presenting for treatment of fecal incontinence in a specialty clinic, validated questionnaires measured impact on quality of life (Modified Manchester Health Questionnaire) and severity (the Fecal Incontinence Severity Index). Bowel symptoms, including frequency, urgency, and stool consistency, were ascertained. Comorbid diseases were self-reported. Linear regression models were constructed from significant univariate variables to examine differences observed in quality of life scores.
Results: The average age was 58.7 +/- 11.5 years, with no differences found in quality of life scores according to race, body mass index, or number of vaginal deliveries (P > .05). Younger age, increased urinary incontinence symptoms, prior cholecystectomy, prior hysterectomy, and severity of bowel symptoms correlated with a negative impact on quality of life in univariate analysis (P < .05). Average severity scores were 30.5 +/- 13.7, with moderate correlation seen with increasing severity and quality of life scores (R2 = 0.60). After controlling for severity, women had increased quality of life scores with more bowel urgency (15 points; 95% CI, 8.1-21.2), harder stool consistency (10 points; 95% CI, 3.8-16.3), and prior hysterectomy (9 points; 95% CI, 2.7-15.4).
Conclusion: Bowel symptoms and having undergone a hysterectomy had the greatest negative impact on quality of life in women seeking treatment for fecal incontinence. Targeting individualized treatments to improve bowel symptoms may improve quality of life for women with fecal incontinence.
Comment in
-
Evaluation of stool consistency by a reliable method in patients with fecal incontinence.Dis Colon Rectum. 2011 Feb;54(2):254; author reply 254-5. doi: 10.1007/DCR.0b013e31820204fc. Dis Colon Rectum. 2011. PMID: 21228678 No abstract available.
References
-
- Norton C, Whitehead WE, Bliss DZ, et al. Conservative and pharmacologic management of fecal incontinence in adults. In: Abrams P, Cardozo L, Khoury S, Wein A, editors. Incontinence, 3rd International Consultation on Incontinence. Paris, France: Health Publications Ltd; 2005. pp. 1521–64.
-
- Bharucha AE, Zinsmeister AR, Locke GR, Seide BM, McKeon K, Schleck CD, Melton LJ. Prevalence and burden of fecal incontinence: A population-based study in women. Gastroenterology. 2005;105(1):42. - PubMed
-
- Macmillan AK, Merrie AEH, Marshall RJ, Parry BR. The Prevalence of Fecal Incontinence in Community-Dwelling Adults: A Systematic Review of the Literature. Dis Colon Rectum. 2004;47:1341–9. - PubMed
-
- Nelson R, Norton N, Cautley E, et al. Community-based prevalence of anal incontinence. JAMA. 1995;274:559–561. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
