Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2010 Dec;13(4):359-68.
doi: 10.1111/j.1369-7625.2010.00607.x.

Critical appraisal guidelines for assessing the quality and impact of user involvement in research

David Wright  1 , Claire Foster, Ziv Amir, Jim Elliott, Roger Wilson
Affiliations

Critical appraisal guidelines for assessing the quality and impact of user involvement in research

David Wright et al. Health Expect. 2010 Dec.

Abstract

Background: The involvement of service users in the design and conduct of health research has developed significantly in the UK in recent years. Involving service users is now seen as a core component of good research practice for all forms of health research. Given the important role that users have in health research, it is necessary to develop guidelines for their effective involvement. Whilst guidelines are currently being formulated, there remain no criteria with which to assess user involvement in published studies and funding applications.

Objective: This study offers guidelines for appraising the quality and impact of user involvement in published papers and grant applications.

Methods: Appraisal guidelines for user involvement have been developed on the basis of available literature and experiences from studies involving cancer patients and carers in the design and conduct of research.

Findings: Nine appraisal criteria have been developed. Criteria include issues such as 'Is the rationale for involving users clearly demonstrated?', 'Is the level of user involvement appropriate?', 'Is the recruitment strategy appropriate?', and 'Is the nature of training appropriate?'

Conclusion: Generating and applying guidelines is vital if the impact of user involvement agenda in health research is to be understood.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Hanley J, Bradburn J, Barnes M et al. Involving the Public in NHS, Public Health, and Social Care Research: Briefing Notes for Researchers, 2nd edn Eastleigh: Involve, 2003.
    1. Parkes M, Panelli R. Integrating catchment ecosystems and community health: the value of participatory action research. Ecosystem Health, 2001; 7: 85–106.
    1. Cassidy J. Why patient representation might harm science? Breast Cancer Research, 2007; 9 (Suppl. 2): S4.
    1. Department of Health . Research Governance Framework for Health and Social Care, 2nd edn London: Department of Health, 2005.
    1. Boote J, Barber R, Cooper C. Principles and indicators of successful consumer involvement in NHS research: results of a Delphi study and subgroup analysis. Health Policy, 2006; 75: 280–297. - PubMed