Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2010;11(7):126.
doi: 10.1186/gb-2010-11-7-126. Epub 2010 Jul 15.

How do proteins gain new domains?

Affiliations

How do proteins gain new domains?

Joseph A Marsh et al. Genome Biol. 2010.

Abstract

A study of the contributions of different mechanisms of domain gain in animal proteins suggests that gene fusion is likely to be most frequent.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Possible mechanisms for the gain of protein domains. Colored blocks represent exons, with red, blue and green indicating exons coding for different domains. Solid black lines represent introns and red lines indicate intergenic regions. (a) Gene fusion. The noncoding region between two genes is modified so that the exons of the first gene become spliced with the second. (b) Exon extension. The noncoding region following an exon becomes part of the exon and codes for a new domain. (c) Exon recombination. The exons of two genes become directly joined. (d) Intron recombination. An exon from one gene is inserted into the intron of another. (e) Retroposition. A retrotransposon sequence (RT, purple) mediates the copying of itself and a neighboring gene region via an mRNA intermediate, followed by insertion into another gene.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Hypothetical model of a multidomain protein gaining an intrinsically disordered region via a carboxy-terminal exon extension. This protein has three folded domains (based on Protein Data Bank entry 1BIB), colored yellow, blue and red, and a 40-residue disordered extension at its carboxyl terminus, colored green. The folded domains are shown as a surface representation, and the disordered region is shown as an ensemble model with multiple distinct structures representing its substantial conformational heterogeneity.

References

    1. Apic G, Gough J, Teichmann SA. Domain combinations in archaeal, eubacterial and eukaryotic proteomes. J Mol Biol. 2001;310:311–325. doi: 10.1006/jmbi.2001.4776. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Ekman D, Björklund AK, Elofsson A. Quantification of the elevated rate of domain rearrangements in metazoa. J Mol Biol. 2007;372:1337–1348. doi: 10.1016/j.jmb.2007.06.022. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Weiner J, Beaussart F, Bornberg-Bauer E. Domain deletions and substitutions in the modular protein evolution. FEBS J. 2006;273:2037–2047. doi: 10.1111/j.1742-4658.2006.05220.x. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Björklund AK, Ekman D, Light S, Frey-Skött J, Elofsson A. Domain rearrangements in protein evolution. J Mol Biol. 2005;353:911–923. doi: 10.1016/j.jmb.2005.08.067. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Fong JH, Geer LY, Panchenko AR, Bryant SH. Modeling the evolution of protein domain architectures using maximum parsimony. J Mol Biol. 2007;366:307–315. doi: 10.1016/j.jmb.2006.11.017. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources