Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2011 Feb 23;7(1):39-42.
doi: 10.1098/rsbl.2010.0482. Epub 2010 Jul 14.

Responding to inequities: gorillas try to maintain their competitive advantage during play fights

Affiliations

Responding to inequities: gorillas try to maintain their competitive advantage during play fights

Edwin J C Van Leeuwen et al. Biol Lett. .

Abstract

Humans respond to unfair situations in various ways. Experimental research has revealed that non-human species also respond to unequal situations in the form of inequity aversions when they have the disadvantage. The current study focused on play fights in gorillas to explore for the first time, to our knowledge, if/how non-human species respond to inequities in natural social settings. Hitting causes a naturally occurring inequity among individuals and here it was specifically assessed how the hitters and their partners engaged in play chases that followed the hitting. The results of this work showed that the hitters significantly more often moved first to run away immediately after the encounter than their partners. These findings provide evidence that non-human species respond to inequities by trying to maintain their competitive advantages. We conclude that non-human primates, like humans, may show different responses to inequities and that they may modify them depending on if they have the advantage or the disadvantage.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Mean number (+s.e.m.) of play chase bouts preceded by unequal hitting of every subject. Hitters and their playmates were compared in who made the first move to run and who ran away. White bars, hitter (n = 8); grey bars, subject that was hit (n = 7). The asterisks denote significant differences in values between hitters and their playmates.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
‘Hit-and-run’ in gorillas. The individual on the left (a,b) hits the individual on the right and (c,d) then runs away. The individual on the right (c,d) responds by chasing. Seven of eight subjects displayed this behaviour (electronic supplementary material, video).

References

    1. Fehr E., Schmidt K. M. 1999. A theory of fairness, competition, and cooperation. Q. J. Econ. 114, 817–86810.1162/003355399556151 (doi:10.1162/003355399556151) - DOI - DOI
    1. Henrich J., Boyd R., Bowles S., Camerer C., Fehr E., Gintis H., McElreath R. 2001. In search of Homo economicus: behavioral experiments in 15 small-scale societies. Am. Econ. Rev. 91, 73–7810.1257/aer.91.2.73 (doi:10.1.1.23.2064) - DOI - DOI
    1. Brosnan S. F., Schiff H., de Waal F. B. M. 2005. Tolerance for inequity increases with social closeness in chimpanzees. Proc. R. Soc. B 272, 253–25810.1098/rspb.2004.2947 (doi:10.1098/rspb.2004.2947) - DOI - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Brosnan S. F., de Waal F. B. M. 2003. Monkeys reject unequal pay. Nature 425, 297–29910.1038/nature01963 (doi:10.1038/nature01963) - DOI - DOI - PubMed
    1. Range F., Horn L., Viranyi Z., Huber L. 2008. The absence of reward induces inequity aversion in dogs. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 106, 340–34510.1073/pnas.0810957105 (doi:10.1073/pnas.0810957105) - DOI - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types