Immunohistochemistry of ultrastructural changes in scarring lupus erythematosus
- PMID: 20637030
- DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2230.2010.03859.x
Immunohistochemistry of ultrastructural changes in scarring lupus erythematosus
Abstract
Background: The various clinical types of lupus erythematosus (LE) show an essentially similar histological picture, and the subsets of LE cannot easily be distinguished by histology alone. However, there is an important clinical difference: lesions of discoid LE (DLE) cause scarring, particularly on the scalp, whereas lesions of subacute and acute LE heal without scarring. The focal thickening of the basement membrane zone (BMZ) in DLE lesions represents an important histopathological finding, and there is little known about the nature of these alterations at the BMZ level.
Aim: To investigate BMZ alterations in the basement membrane zone (BMZ) in cutaneous LE (CLE) by immunohistochemistry.
Methods: Skin biopsies from 30 patients with CLE [DLE and subacute CLE (SCLE)] and from 10 controls were studied using antibodies to cytokeratin 5, cytokeratin 14, bullous pemphigoid (BP)180, BP230, plectin, laminin 5, collagen IV and collagen VII. Results. There was increased expression of components of the lamina lucida, lamina densa and anchoring fibrils in active DLE, whereas expression was normal in SCLE and control tissues, and in areas of scarring in DLE. In addition, higher expression of the hemidesmosome-associated antigens (BP230 and plectin) was found in active DLE. The expression of other antigens was similar in all tissues examined.
Conclusions: These alterations in the BMZ suggest that the BMZ may react in a different way in active DLE than in SCLE, and that the BMZ may remodel in different ways. These immunohistochemical differences may provide a new method of histological differentiation between the various LE subtypes.
© 2010 The Author(s). Journal compilation © 2010 British Association of Dermatologists.
Similar articles
-
Subacute cutaneous lupus erythematosus and discoid lupus erythematosus. Comparative histopathologic findings.Arch Dermatol. 1984 Mar;120(3):332-7. Arch Dermatol. 1984. PMID: 6703733
-
Cutaneous manifestations of systemic lupus erythematosus.Br J Dermatol. 1996 Sep;135(3):355-62. Br J Dermatol. 1996. PMID: 8949425
-
Matrix metalloproteinases as mediators of tissue injury in different forms of cutaneous lupus erythematosus.Br J Dermatol. 2007 Nov;157(5):970-80. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2133.2007.08166.x. Epub 2007 Sep 13. Br J Dermatol. 2007. PMID: 17854363
-
Cutaneous manifestations of lupus erythematosus.G Ital Dermatol Venereol. 2014 Oct;149(5):549-54. Epub 2014 Jul 31. G Ital Dermatol Venereol. 2014. PMID: 25077888 Review.
-
Cutaneous lupus erythematosus: issues in diagnosis and treatment.Am J Clin Dermatol. 2009;10(6):365-81. doi: 10.2165/11310780-000000000-00000. Am J Clin Dermatol. 2009. PMID: 19824738 Review.
Cited by
-
A review of cutaneous lupus erythematosus: improving outcomes with a multidisciplinary approach.J Multidiscip Healthc. 2019 May 31;12:419-428. doi: 10.2147/JMDH.S179623. eCollection 2019. J Multidiscip Healthc. 2019. PMID: 31213824 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Classifying discoid lupus erythematosus: background, gaps, and difficulties.Int J Womens Dermatol. 2016 Mar 7;2(1):8-12. doi: 10.1016/j.ijwd.2016.01.001. eCollection 2016 Mar. Int J Womens Dermatol. 2016. PMID: 28491994 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Classifying discoid lupus erythematosus: background, gaps, and difficulties.Int J Womens Dermatol. 2017 Feb 16;3(1 Suppl):S62-S66. doi: 10.1016/j.ijwd.2017.02.013. eCollection 2017 Mar. Int J Womens Dermatol. 2017. PMID: 28492042 Free PMC article. Review.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials