[Recent developments of pharmacogenomics in the treatment of colorectal cancers]
- PMID: 20637356
- DOI: 10.1016/j.pharma.2010.04.001
[Recent developments of pharmacogenomics in the treatment of colorectal cancers]
Abstract
Colorectal cancer (CCR), which is one of the most common causes of cancer, has benefited from the major advances in the understanding of the intracellular signaling pathways implicated in the initiation, growing and local and metastasis dissemination of tumor, which have occurred during the 20 past years. The pharmacogenomics approach, especially the determination of the genetic polymorphisms, tries to find prognosis and predictive biomarkers permitting to identify patients who could benefit from a particular treatment or those exhibiting higher risks of toxicity. Among the numerous biomarkers, which have been studied, few are currently in use in clinical practice. The phenotyping of DPD and UGT1A1 activities, and to a lesser extent, its genotyping, appears as the most useful tool in terms of prediction of toxicities induced by two major drugs: 5-FU and irinotecan. For oxaliplatin, the determination of the polymorphisms of reparases and detoxification systems such as GSTpi seems interesting, but its exact place should be more defined. It is in the field of targeted therapies that the pharmacogenomics approach seems to be the more relevant. KRAS mutation is a dramatic example of single nucleotide polymorphism, which is able to identify a priori patients that could receive or not an anti-EGFR monoclonal antibody such as cetuximab or panitumumab. It is obvious that pre-clinical identification of molecular biomarkers predictive of the sensitivity of the drug targets, which subsequently implicate the selection of patients and the rational evaluation of responses, will be the cornerstone of any clinical trials concerning targeted therapies. Besides the determination of drug target polymorphisms, it is also important to consider those related to the distribution and metabolism. In this area, the determination of enzymatic activities should recover its place besides the genomic profiling.
Copyright 2010 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.
Similar articles
-
Role of pharmacogenetics as predictive biomarkers of response and/or toxicity in the treatment of colorectal cancer.Clin Colorectal Cancer. 2009 Jan;8(1):15-21. doi: 10.3816/CCC.2009.n.003. Clin Colorectal Cancer. 2009. PMID: 19203892 Review.
-
[Molecular biology in clinical cancer research: the example of digestive cancers].Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique. 2005 Jun;53(3):267-82. doi: 10.1016/s0398-7620(05)84604-8. Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique. 2005. PMID: 16227914 Review. French.
-
The treatment of colorectal carcinoma: standard chemotherapy and beyond.Clin Adv Hematol Oncol. 2004 Sep;2(9):592-8. Clin Adv Hematol Oncol. 2004. PMID: 16163242 Review.
-
[The biological point of view on pharmacogenetics of anticancer agents in colorectal cancer].Bull Cancer. 2008 Oct;95(10):935-42. doi: 10.1684/bdc.2008.0728. Bull Cancer. 2008. PMID: 19004723 French.
-
Activating KRAS mutations and overexpression of epidermal growth factor receptor as independent predictors in metastatic colorectal cancer patients treated with cetuximab.Ann Surg. 2010 Feb;251(2):254-60. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181bc9d96. Ann Surg. 2010. PMID: 20010090
Cited by
-
Germ line polymorphisms as predictive markers for pre-surgical radiochemotherapy in locally advanced rectal cancer: a 5-year literature update and critical review.Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2015 May;71(5):529-39. doi: 10.1007/s00228-015-1824-0. Epub 2015 Mar 6. Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2015. PMID: 25740678 Review.
-
RU486 Metabolite Inhibits CCN1/Cyr61 Secretion by MDA-MB-231-Endothelial Adhesion.Front Pharmacol. 2019 Nov 20;10:1296. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2019.01296. eCollection 2019. Front Pharmacol. 2019. PMID: 31824306 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials
Miscellaneous