Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2010 Nov;126(5):1742-1751.
doi: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e3181efa6c5.

Seroma in lipoabdominoplasty and abdominoplasty: a comparative study using ultrasound

Marcello Di Martino  1 , Fábio Xerfan Nahas, Marcus V J Barbosa, Natalia Alinda Montecinos Ayaviri, Alexandro Kenji Kimura, Simone Maluf Barella, Neil Ferreira Novo, Lydia M Ferreira
Affiliations
Comparative Study

Seroma in lipoabdominoplasty and abdominoplasty: a comparative study using ultrasound

Marcello Di Martino et al. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2010 Nov.

Abstract

Background: Abdominoplasty is one of the most frequently performed cosmetic procedures, and its combination with liposuction has become more common. Seroma is one of the most common complications in abdominoplasty. The aim of this study was to compare the rate of seroma formation in patients who underwent either abdominoplasty with or without the use of quilting sutures or lipoabdominoplasty.

Methods: Fifty-eight female patients were divided into three groups and underwent one of the following procedures: group A (n=21), abdominoplasty without quilting sutures; group B (n=17), abdominoplasty with quilting sutures; and group C (n=20), lipoabdominoplasty. To investigate seroma formation, abdominal ultrasound was performed in five regions of the abdominal wall (epigastrium, umbilical, hypogastrium, right iliac fossa, and left iliac fossa) at two postoperative periods (P1, between postoperative days 11 and 14; and P2, between postoperative days 18 and 21).

Results: The rate of seroma formation at both P1 and P2 was significantly higher in group A. It was observed that in group A at P1, the regions of right iliac fossa and left iliac fossa developed larger fluid collections. In group B, there were no significant differences with respect to fluid collections among the five study regions at both P1 and P2. In group C, there were significantly larger fluid collections in the hypogastrium region at P1 and in the umbilical and hypogastrium regions at P2.

Conclusion: Abdominoplasty with quilting sutures and lipoabdominoplasty are effective techniques for the prevention of seromas compared with abdominoplasty without quilting sutures.

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment in

References

    1. van Uchelen JH, Werker PMN, Kon M. Complications of abdominoplasty in 86 patients. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2001;107:1869.
    1. Matarasso A, Swift R, Rankin M. Abdominoplasty abdominal contour surgery: A national plastic surgery survey. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2006;117:1797.
    1. Baroudi R, Ferreira CAA. Seroma: How to avoid it and how to treat it. Aesthet Surg J. 1998;18:439.
    1. Chaouat M, Levan P, Lalanne B, Buisson T, Nicolau P, Mimoun M. Abdominal dermolipectomies: Early postoperative complications and long-term unfavorable results. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2000;106:1614.
    1. Nahas FX, Ghelfond C, Ferreira LM. Does quilting suture prevent seroma in abdominoplasty? Plast Reconstr Surg. 2007;199:1060.

Publication types