Current status of obstetric anaesthesia: improving satisfaction and safety
- PMID: 20640111
- PMCID: PMC2900093
Current status of obstetric anaesthesia: improving satisfaction and safety
Abstract
The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) reported in 2003 that although the maternal mortality rate has decreased by 99% since 1900, there has been no further decrease in the last two decades1. A more recent report indicates a rate of 11.8 per 100,000 live births2, although anaesthesia-related maternal mortality and morbidity has considerably decreased over the last few decades. Despite the growing complexity of problems and increasing challenges such as pre-existing maternal disease, obesity, and the increasing age of pregnant mothers, anaesthesia related maternal mortality is extremely rare in the developed world. The current safety has been achieved through changes in training, service, technical advances and multidisciplinary approach to care. The rates of general anaesthesia for cesarean delivery have decreased and neuraxial anaesthetics have become the most commonly used techniques. Neuraxial techniques are largely safe and effective, but potential complications, though rare, can be severe.
Keywords: Combined Spinal Epidural (CSE); Hypotension; Maternal mortality; Obesity; Obstetric Anesthesia; Preeclampsia.
Figures
References
-
- Berg CJ, Chang J, Callaghan WM, et al. Pregnancy-related mortality in the United States. 1991-1997. Obstet Gynecol. 2003;101:289–296. - PubMed
-
- Hawkins JL. Anesthesia-related Maternal Mortality. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2003;46:679–87. - PubMed
-
- Mhyre JM. Chestnut's Obstetric Anesthesia. 4th edition. Philadelphia, PA: Mosby, Inc; 2009. Matenal Mortality; pp. 853–861.
-
- Hawkins JL, Chang J, Palmer SK, et al. Anesthesia related maternal mortality in the United States, 1997-2002 (abstract) Society of Obstetric Anesthesia and Perinatology, Abstracts of the 40th Annual Meeting. 2008. p. A-10.
-
- Rosen T. Placenta accrete and cesarean scar pregnancy: Overlooked costs of the rising cesarean section rate. Clin Perinatol. 2008;35:519–29. - PubMed
