Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2010 Aug;13(8):949-56.
doi: 10.1089/jpm.2010.0053.

Communication practices in physician decision-making for an unstable critically ill patient with end-stage cancer

Deepika Mohan  1 , Stewart C Alexander, Sarah K Garrigues, Robert M Arnold, Amber E Barnato
Affiliations

Communication practices in physician decision-making for an unstable critically ill patient with end-stage cancer

Deepika Mohan et al. J Palliat Med. 2010 Aug.

Abstract

Background: Shared decision-making has become the standard of care for most medical treatments. However, little is known about physician communication practices in the decision making for unstable critically ill patients with known end-stage disease.

Objective: To describe communication practices of physicians making treatment decisions for unstable critically ill patients with end-stage cancer, using the framework of shared decision-making.

Design: Analysis of audiotaped encounters between physicians and a standardized patient, in a high-fidelity simulation scenario, to identify best practice communication behaviors. The simulation depicted a 78-year-old man with metastatic gastric cancer, life-threatening hypoxia, and stable preferences to avoid intensive care unit (ICU) admission and intubation. Blinded coders assessed the encounters for verbal communication behaviors associated with handling emotions and discussion of end-of-life goals. We calculated a score for skill at handling emotions (0-6) and at discussing end of life goals (0-16).

Subjects: Twenty-seven hospital-based physicians.

Results: Independent variables included physician demographics and communication behaviors. We used treatment decisions (ICU admission and initiation of palliation) as a proxy for accurate identification of patient preferences. Eight physicians admitted the patient to the ICU, and 16 initiated palliation. Physicians varied, but on average demonstrated low skill at handling emotions (mean, 0.7) and moderate skill at discussing end-of-life goals (mean, 7.4). We found that skill at discussing end-of-life goals was associated with initiation of palliation (p = 0.04).

Conclusions: It is possible to analyze the decision making of physicians managing unstable critically ill patients with end-stage cancer using the framework of shared decision-making.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

FIG. 1.
FIG. 1.
A comparison of two conversations that resulted in different treatment decisions.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Institute of Medicine. Crossing the Quality Chasm. Washington D.C.: National Academy of Sciences; 2001.
    1. Stewart MA. Effective physician-patient communication and health outcomes: A review. CMAJ. 1995;152:1423–1433. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Davidson JE. Powers K. Hedayat KM. Tieszen M. Kon AA. Shepard E. Spuhler V. Todres ID. Levy M. Barr J. Ghandi R. Hirsch G. Armstrong D. American College of Critical Care Medicine Task Force 2004–2005, Society of Critical Care Medicine: Clinical practice guidelines for support of the family in the patient-centered intensive care unit: American College of Critical Care Medicine task force 2004–2005. Crit Care Med. 2007;35:605–622. - PubMed
    1. Kuehn BM. States explore shared decision-making. JAMA. 2009;301:2539–2540. - PubMed
    1. Butow P. Juraskova I. Chang S. Lopez AL. Brown R. Bernhard J. Shared decision making coding systems: how do they compare in the oncology context. Patient Educ Couns. 2010;78:261–268. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources