Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2010 Aug;39(4):448-53.

Radial forearm versus anterolateral thigh free flaps for laryngopharyngectomy defects: prospective, randomized trial

Affiliations
  • PMID: 20643014
Randomized Controlled Trial

Radial forearm versus anterolateral thigh free flaps for laryngopharyngectomy defects: prospective, randomized trial

Andrew T Morrissey et al. J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2010 Aug.

Abstract

Objective: To investigate the use of anterolateral thigh flaps versus radial forearm free flaps for the reconstruction of laryngopharyngectomy defects in a prospective, randomized study.

Methods: Nineteen patients who were to undergo laryngopharyngectomy were randomized into either anterolateral thigh or radial forearm groups. The primary outcome measure was complication rate (eg, flap failure, fistula formation, pharyngeal stenosis). Secondary outcome measures included donor-site morbidity (limb function, cosmesis, pain).

Results: There was a significant (p = .04) increase in reconstructive complications in the anterolateral thigh group, including esophageal stenosis and pharyngeal fistulae. There was no significant difference in donor-site complications.

Conclusion: There is an increased free flap complication rate without decreased flap donor-site morbidity when using the anterolateral thigh flap to reconstruct laryngopharyngectomy defects. As such, we recommend the radial forearm free flap as the preferred flap for reconstruction of laryngopharyngectomy defects.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources