Presenting the results of Cochrane Systematic Reviews to a consumer audience: a qualitative study
- PMID: 20643912
- DOI: 10.1177/0272989X10375853
Presenting the results of Cochrane Systematic Reviews to a consumer audience: a qualitative study
Abstract
Objective: To develop and obtain feedback about a summary format for Cochrane reviews that is accessible to a consumer audience, without oversimplification or incorrect presentation.
Methods: We developed 3 versions of a Plain Language Summary (PLS) format of a Cochrane Systematic Review. Using a semi-structured interview guide we tested these versions among 34 members of the public in Norway, Argentina, Canada, and Australia. The authors analyzed feedback, identified problems, and generated new solutions before retesting to produce a final version of a Plain Language Summary format.
Results: Participants preferred results presented as words, supplemented by numbers in a table. There was a lack of understanding regarding the difference between a review and an individual study, that the effect is rarely an exact number, that evidence can be of low or high quality, and that level of quality is a separate issue from intervention effect. Participants also found it difficult to move between presentations of dichotomous and continuous outcomes. Rephrasing the introduction helped participants grasp the concept of a review. Confidence intervals were largely ignored or misunderstood. Our attempts to explain them were only partially successful. Text modifiers (''probably,'' ''may'') to convey different levels of quality were only partially understood, whereas symbols with explanations were more helpful. Participants often understood individual information elements about effect size and quality of these results, but did not always actively merge these elements.
Conclusion: Through testing and iteration the authors identified and addressed several problems, using explanations, rephrasing, and symbols to present scientific concepts. Other problems remain, including how best to present confidence intervals and continuous outcomes. Future research should also test information elements in combination rather than in isolation. The new Plain Language Summary format is being evaluated in a randomized controlled trial.
Similar articles
-
Less is more in presenting quality information to consumers.Med Care Res Rev. 2007 Apr;64(2):169-90. doi: 10.1177/10775587070640020301. Med Care Res Rev. 2007. PMID: 17406019 Clinical Trial.
-
Knowledge and health information communication in Tanzania.East Afr J Public Health. 2007 Apr;4(1):33-9. East Afr J Public Health. 2007. PMID: 17907759
-
Effectiveness of an intervention for disseminating Cochrane reviews to nurses.Medsurg Nurs. 2007 Dec;16(6):373-7. Medsurg Nurs. 2007. PMID: 18390257
-
Summaries of findings, descriptions of interventions, and information about adverse effects would make reviews more informative.J Clin Epidemiol. 2006 Aug;59(8):770-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2005.12.011. Epub 2006 May 30. J Clin Epidemiol. 2006. PMID: 16828668 Review.
-
Non-medical management of asthma in adults.Int J Nurs Pract. 2010 Apr;16(2):208-19. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-172X.2010.01835.x. Int J Nurs Pract. 2010. PMID: 20487068 Review.
Cited by
-
The Cochrane Library review titles that are important to users of health care, a Cochrane Consumer Network project.Health Expect. 2013 Dec;16(4):e146-63. doi: 10.1111/j.1369-7625.2011.00723.x. Epub 2011 Sep 6. Health Expect. 2013. PMID: 21895902 Free PMC article.
-
Non-corticosteroid immunosuppressive medications for steroid-sensitive nephrotic syndrome in children.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Apr 16;4(4):CD002290. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002290.pub5. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020. Update in: Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024 Nov 8;11:CD002290. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002290.pub6. PMID: 32297308 Free PMC article. Updated.
-
Making randomised trials more efficient: report of the first meeting to discuss the Trial Forge platform.Trials. 2015 Jun 5;16:261. doi: 10.1186/s13063-015-0776-0. Trials. 2015. PMID: 26044814 Free PMC article.
-
Do Cochrane summaries help student midwives understand the findings of Cochrane systematic reviews: the BRIEF randomised trial.Syst Rev. 2016 Mar 1;5:40. doi: 10.1186/s13643-016-0214-8. Syst Rev. 2016. PMID: 26932724 Free PMC article.
-
Cochrane plain language summaries are highly heterogeneous with low adherence to the standards.BMC Med Res Methodol. 2016 May 23;16:61. doi: 10.1186/s12874-016-0162-y. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2016. PMID: 27216616 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources