Internet-based screening for sexually transmitted infections to reach nonclinic populations in the community: risk factors for infection in men
- PMID: 20644498
- PMCID: PMC3187615
- DOI: 10.1097/OLQ.0b013e3181e3d771
Internet-based screening for sexually transmitted infections to reach nonclinic populations in the community: risk factors for infection in men
Abstract
Background: Internet-based screening for sexually transmitted infections (STIs) has been acceptable to women, and can reach high-risk populations. No prior published data describe internet-based screening for Chlamydia trachomatis, Neisseria gonorrhoeae, and Trichomonas vaginalis in men. We studied whether internet-based screening was acceptable and reached a high-risk population, and what risk factors were associated with STI positivity.
Methods: The website, www.iwantthekit.org, encouraged men ≥14 years of age to request a home self-sampling kit and a questionnaire on risk factors and acceptability of internet-based screening. Penile swabs and urine samples were tested for C. trachomatis, N. gonorrhoeae, and T. vaginalis using a nucleic acid amplification test. Risk factors and acceptability were examined using chi squared tests and logistic regression.
Results: Of 501 samples received for testing, 106 (21%) were positive for at least one STI, 64 (13%) for chlamydia, 4 (1%) for gonorrhea, and 49 (10%) for trichomonas. In multivariable analyses, age, race, household income, and frequency of condom use were independently associated with infection with at least one STI. Of the total respondents, 34% had a prior STI; 29% reported having a partner with an STI, but only 13% reported always using a condom. Among the men who participated in this study, 77% preferred a self-administered specimen versus attending a clinic, 89% reported that swab use was easy, and 89% reported that they would use internet-based screening again.
Conclusions: Men who accessed internet-based screening had known risk factors for STIs and had a high prevalence of infection. Internet-based screening was acceptable and could reach these high-risk men who might not otherwise be reached through traditional means.
References
-
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. National Profile. Atlanta, GA: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services; Dec, 2008. Sexually Transmitted Disease Surveillance, 2007.
-
- Hillis SD, Wasserheit JN. Screening for chlamydia--a key to the prevention of pelvic inflammatory disease. N Engl J Med. 1996 May 23;334(21):1399–1401. - PubMed
-
- Joki-Korpela P, Sahrakorpi N, Halttunen M, et al. The role of Chlamydia trachomatis infection in male infertility. Fertil Steril. 2009 Apr;91(4 Suppl):1448–1450. - PubMed
-
- Weinstock H, Berman S, Cates W., Jr Sexually transmitted diseases among American youth: incidence and prevalence estimates, 2000. Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2004 Jan–Feb;36(1):6–10. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical