In vitro and in vivo high-throughput assays for the testing of anti-Trypanosoma cruzi compounds
- PMID: 20644616
- PMCID: PMC2903469
- DOI: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0000740
In vitro and in vivo high-throughput assays for the testing of anti-Trypanosoma cruzi compounds
Abstract
Background: The two available drugs for treatment of T. cruzi infection, nifurtimox and benznidazole (BZ), have potential toxic side effects and variable efficacy, contributing to their low rate of use. With scant economic resources available for antiparasitic drug discovery and development, inexpensive, high-throughput and in vivo assays to screen potential new drugs and existing compound libraries are essential.
Methods: In this work, we describe the development and validation of improved methods to test anti-T. cruzi compounds in vitro and in vivo using parasite lines expressing the firefly luciferase (luc) or the tandem tomato fluorescent protein (tdTomato). For in vitro assays, the change in fluorescence intensity of tdTomato-expressing lines was measured as an indicator of parasite replication daily for 4 days and this method was used to identify compounds with IC(50) lower than that of BZ.
Findings: This method was highly reproducible and had the added advantage of requiring relatively low numbers of parasites and no additional indicator reagents, enzymatic post-processes or laborious visual counting. In vivo, mice were infected in the footpads with fluorescent or bioluminescent parasites and the signal intensity was measured as a surrogate of parasite load at the site of infection before and after initiation of drug treatment. Importantly, the efficacy of various drugs as determined in this short-term (<2 weeks) assay mirrored that of a 40 day treatment course.
Conclusion: These methods should make feasible broader and higher-throughput screening programs needed to identify potential new drugs for the treatment of T. cruzi infection and for their rapid validation in vivo.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Figures
References
-
- WHO. Control of Chagas disease. World Health Organ Tech Rep Ser. 2002;905:1–109, back cover. - PubMed
-
- Schofield CJ, Jannin J, Salvatella R. The future of Chagas disease control. Trends Parasitol. 2006;22:583–588. - PubMed
-
- Rodriques Coura J, de Castro SL. A critical review on Chagas disease chemotherapy. Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz. 2002;97:3–24. - PubMed
-
- Bern C, Montgomery SP, Herwaldt BL, Rassi A, Jr, Marin-Neto JA, et al. Evaluation and treatment of chagas disease in the United States: a systematic review. JAMA. 2007;298:2171–2181. - PubMed
-
- Viotti R, Vigliano C, Lococo B, Alvarez MG, Petti M, et al. Side effects of benznidazole as treatment in chronic Chagas disease: fears and realities. Expert Rev Anti Infect Ther. 2009;7:157–163. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Research Materials
