Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2010 Dec;19(4):211-22.
doi: 10.1002/mpr.320.

Evaluation of the DSM-IV and ICD-10 criteria for depressive disorders in a community population in Japan using item response theory

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Evaluation of the DSM-IV and ICD-10 criteria for depressive disorders in a community population in Japan using item response theory

Mari Saito et al. Int J Methods Psychiatr Res. 2010 Dec.

Abstract

The DSM-IV and ICD-10 are both operational diagnostic systems that classify known psychological disorders according to the number of criteria symptoms. Certain discrepancies between the criteria exist and may lead to some inconsistencies in psychiatric research. The purpose of this study was to investigate these differences in the assessment of depression with item response theory (IRT) analyses. The World Mental Health-Japan (WMHJ) Survey is an epidemiological survey of the general population in Japan. We analyzed data from the WMHJ completed by 353 respondents who had either depressive mood or diminished interest. A two-parameter logistic model was used to evaluate the characteristics of the symptoms of the DSM-IV and ICD-10. IRT analyses revealed that the symptoms about psychomotor activity, worthlessness and self-reproach were more informative and suggestive of greater severity, while the symptoms about dietary habits were less informative. IRT analyses also revealed that the ICD-10 seems more sensitive to the mild range of the depression spectrum compared to the DSM-IV. Although there were some variations in severity among respondents, most of the respondents diagnosed with a severe or moderate depressive episode according to the ICD-10 were also diagnosed with a major depressive episode according to the DSM-IV.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Item characteristic curves of the criteria (Q1–Q14, see Table 1) for depressive disorders derived from the DSM‐IV (a) and ICD‐10 (b) as a function of the latent severity (horizontal) and the probability of endorsement (vertical) among respondents in a community of Japan who endorsed either depressive mood or markedly diminished interest (N = 353): WMHJ 2002–2004 Survey.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Information functions for symptom criteria for the DSM‐IV (solid line) and ICD‐10 (dotted line) diagnoses of depressive disorders, and the distribution of respondents by severity (lower histogram): WMHJ 2002–2004 Survey.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Box‐whisker plots of the latent severity of depressive disorders estimated by IRT model according to the DSM‐IV (D) and ICD‐10 (I) diagnosis categories among respondents in a community of Japan who endorsed either depressive mood or markedly diminished interest for two weeks (N = 353): WMHJ 2002–2004 Survey.

References

    1. American Psychiatric Association (1987) Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 3rd edition‐revised, American Psychiatric Association.
    1. American Psychiatric Association (1994) Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 4th Edition, American Psychiatric Association.
    1. Aggen S.H., Neale M.C., Kendler K.S. (2005) DSM criteria for major depression: evaluating symptom patterns using latent‐trait item response models. Psychological Medicine, 35, 475–487, DOI: 10.1017/S0033291704003563 - PubMed
    1. Boeck P.D., Wilson M. (2004) Explanatory Item Response Models: A Generalized Linear and Nonlinear Approach (3rd ed.), Springer.
    1. Cuijpers P., Smit F. (2002) Excess mortality in depression: a meta‐analysis of community studies. Journal of Affective Disorders, 72, 227–236, DOI: 10.1016/S0165‐0327(01)00413‐X - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms