Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2010 Oct;106(4):547-55.
doi: 10.1093/aob/mcq149. Epub 2010 Jul 19.

Pollination and late-acting self-incompatibility in Cyrtanthus breviflorus (Amaryllidaceae): implications for seed production

Affiliations

Pollination and late-acting self-incompatibility in Cyrtanthus breviflorus (Amaryllidaceae): implications for seed production

Glenda Vaughton et al. Ann Bot. 2010 Oct.

Abstract

Background and aims: Animal pollination is typically an uncertain process that interacts with self-incompatibility status to determine reproductive success. Seed set is often pollen-limited, but species with late-acting self-incompatibility (SI) may be particularly vulnerable, if self-pollen deposition results in ovule discounting. Pollination is examined and the occurrence of late-acting SI and ovule discounting assessed in Cyrtanthus breviflorus.

Methods: The pollination system was characterized by observing floral visitors and assessing nectar production and spectral reflectance of flowers. To assess late-acting SI and ovule discounting, growth of self- and cross-pollen tubes, and seed set following open pollination or hand pollination with varying proportions of self- and cross-pollen, were examined.

Key results: Native honeybees Apis mellifera scutellata pollinated flowers as they actively collected pollen. Most flowers (≥70 %) did not contain nectar, while the rest produced minute volumes of dilute nectar. The flowers which are yellow to humans are visually conspicuous to bees with a strong contrast between UV-reflecting tepals and UV-absorbing anthers and pollen. Plants were self-incompatible, but self-rejection was late-acting and both self- and cross-pollen tubes penetrated ovules. Seed set of open-pollinated flowers was pollen-limited, despite pollen deposition exceeding ovule number by 6-fold. Open-pollinated seed set was similar to that of the cross + self-pollen treatment, but was less than that of the cross-pollen-only treatment.

Conclusions: Flowers of C. breviflorus are pollinated primarily by pollen-collecting bees and possess a late-acting SI system, previously unknown in this clade of the Amaryllidaceae. Pollinators of C. breviflorus deposit mixtures of cross- and self-pollen and, because SI is late-acting, self-pollen disables ovules, reducing female fertility. This study thus contributes to growing evidence that seed production in plants with late-acting SI systems is frequently limited by pollen quality, even when pollinators are abundant.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1.
Fig. 1.
Flowers of Cyrtanthus breviflorus (A) approached by a honeybee and (B) with honeybee contacting anthers. Abbreviation: s, stigma. Scale bars = 5 mm.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 2.
Reflectance spectra for (A) pollen and anthers and (B) upper and lower tepals in Cyrtanthus breviflorus. Each curve represents the mean spectrum calculated from individual replicates.
Fig. 3.
Fig. 3.
Mean (± s.e.) percentage of (A) fruit set and (B) seed set following cross-, self- and open-pollination in the Campus and Pelham patches of Cyrtanthus breviflorus, as indicated.
Fig. 4.
Fig. 4.
Pollen tubes in cross-pollinated (on the left) and self-pollinated (on the right) pistils of Cyrtanthus breviflorus. Fluorescence micrographs show pollen tubes on stigmas (A, B), in mid-styles (C, D), at the top of ovaries (E, F) and associated with individual ovules (G, H).
Fig. 5.
Fig. 5.
Mean (± s.e.) percentage of fruit set and seed set, as indicated, of Cyrtanthus breviflorus flowers pollinated with cross-pollen, cross + self-pollen and cross + dead pollen, and open-pollinated.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Aizen MA, Harder LD. Expanding the limits of the pollen-limitation concept: effects of pollen quality and quality. Ecology. 2007;88:271–281. - PubMed
    1. Ashman T-L, Morgan MT. Explaining phenotypic selection on plant attractive characters: male function, gender balance or ecological context? Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series B. 2004;271:553–559. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ashman T-L, Knight TM, Steets JA, et al. Pollen limitation of plant reproduction: ecological and evolutionary causes and consequences. Ecology. 2004;85:2408–2421.
    1. Barrett SCH, Lloyd DG, Arroyo J. Stylar polymorphisms and the evolution of heterostyly in Narcissus (Amaryllidaceae) In: Lloyd DG, Barrett SCH, editors. Floral biology: studies on floral evolution in animal-pollinated plants. New York, NY: Chapman and Hall; 1996. pp. 339–376.
    1. Barrett SCH, Cole WW, Arroyo J, Cruzan MB, Lloyd DG. Sexual polymorphisms in Narcissus triandrus (Amaryllidaceae): is this species tristylous? Heredity. 1997;78:135–145.