Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2010 Sep;83(993):785-90.
doi: 10.1259/bjr/58020866. Epub 2010 Jul 20.

First-pass perfusion imaging of solitary pulmonary nodules with 64-detector row CT: comparison of perfusion parameters of malignant and benign lesions

Affiliations

First-pass perfusion imaging of solitary pulmonary nodules with 64-detector row CT: comparison of perfusion parameters of malignant and benign lesions

Y Li et al. Br J Radiol. 2010 Sep.

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to determine the usefulness of first-pass whole nodule perfusion imaging in the differentiation of benign and malignant solitary pulmonary nodules (SPNs). 77 patients with non-calcified SPNs (46 malignant, 22 benign and 9 active inflammatory) underwent first-pass perfusion imaging with a 64-detector row CT scanner. Perfusion, peak enhancement intensity (PEI), time to peak (TTP) and blood volume (BV) were measured and statistically compared among different groups. Mean perfusion, PEI and BV for benign SPNs were significantly lower than those for malignant nodules (p<0.05) and active infections (p<0.05), but the differences were not statistically significant between malignant tumours and active infections (p>0.05). Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis showed that SPNs with perfusion greater than 30.6 ml min(-1) ml(-1), PEI higher than 23.3 HU or BV larger than 12.2 ml per 100 g were more likely to be malignant. In conclusion, first-pass perfusion imaging with 64-detector row CT is a feasible way of assessing whole nodule perfusion and helpful in differentiating benign from malignant SPNs.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
A 68-year-old male patient with adenocarcinoma (malignant solitary pulmonary nodule). Functional maps of perfusion, peak enhancement intensity (PEI), time to peak (TTP) and blood volume (BV) show that the distribution of perfusion within the tumour is heterogeneous. The colour spectrum indicates the value of the perfusion parameters, ranging from high (red) to low (blue). Values of perfusion, PEI, TTP and BV are 44.8 ml min–1 ml–1, 53.0 HU, 37.0 s and 25.4 ml per 100 g, respectively.
Figure 2
Figure 2
A 28-year-old female patient with tuberculoma (benign solitary pulmonary nodule). Functional maps of perfusion, peak enhancement intensity (PEI), time to peak (TTP) and blood volume (BV) show that enhancement of the nodule are relatively low. Values of perfusion, PEI, TTP and BV are 3.8 ml min–1 ml–1, 4.4 HU, 21.0 s and 0.2 ml per 100 g, respectively.
Figure 3
Figure 3
A 32-year-old male patient with focal organising pneumonia (active infection). Functional maps of perfusion, peak enhancement intensity (PEI), time to peak (TTP) and blood volume (BV) show that enhancement of the nodule are relatively high. Values of perfusion, PEI, TTP and BV are 173.0 ml min–1 ml–1, 208.3 HU, 16.0 s and 38.9 ml per 100 g, respectively.

References

    1. Yamashita K, Matsunobe S, Tsuda T, et al. Solitary pulmonary nodules: preliminary study of evaluation with incremental dynamic CT. Radiology 1995;194:399–405 - PubMed
    1. Zhang M, Kono M. Solid pulmonary nodules: evaluation of blood flow patterns with dynamic CT. Radiology 1997;205:471–8 - PubMed
    1. Swensen SJ, Brown LR, Colby TV, Weaver Al. Pulmonary nodules: CT evaluation of enhancement with iodinated contrast material. Radiology 1995;194:393–8 - PubMed
    1. Swensen SJ, Brown LR, Colby TV, Weaver AL. Lung nodule enhancement at CT: prospective findings. Radiology 1996;201:447–55 - PubMed
    1. Swensen SJ, Viggiano RW, Midthun DE, Patz EF, Jr, et al. Nodule enhancement at CT: multicenter study. Radiology 2000;214:73–80 - PubMed