Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2010 Dec;18(12):1289-95.
doi: 10.1038/ejhg.2010.114. Epub 2010 Jul 21.

Comparing family members' motivations and attitudes towards genetic testing for hereditary breast and ovarian cancer: a qualitative analysis

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Comparing family members' motivations and attitudes towards genetic testing for hereditary breast and ovarian cancer: a qualitative analysis

Caroline Dancyger et al. Eur J Hum Genet. 2010 Dec.

Abstract

Genetic testing for hereditary breast and ovarian cancer reveals significant risk information regarding one's chances of developing cancer that has potential implications for patients and their families. This study reports on the motivations and attitudes of index patients and their relatives towards genetic testing for hereditary breast and ovarian cancer. In total, 10 female index patients and 20 of their relatives were interviewed regarding their experiences of communicating genetic information within their families, and their motivations and attitudes towards genetic testing. The analysis found two types of 'family groups': groups strongly committed to genetic testing and groups uncertain about testing. Within committed family groups, index patients and their relatives felt obliged to be tested for others, leading some relatives to be tested without having fully thought through their decision or the implications of knowing their mutation status. These family groups also described considerations in relation to the value of testing for themselves. In family groups uncertain about testing, relatives had not attended for predictive testing, had postponed decision making until some point in the future or had expressed ambivalence about the value of testing for themselves. Results suggest the value of explicitly acknowledging motivations for genetic testing within the context of family obligations, relationships and communication, and the possible value of involving family members in genetic counselling and decision making from a family's first contact with genetic services.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. McIntosh A, Shaw C, Evans G, et al. Clinical Guidelines and Evidence Review for the Classification and Care of Women at Risk of Familial Breast Cancer London: National Collaborating Centre for Primary Care/University of Sheffield. NICE guideline CG014; 2004. updated 2006.
    1. Gaff CL, Clarke AJ, Atkinson P, et al. Process and outcome in communication of genetic information within families: a systematic review. Eur J Hum Genet. 2007;15:999–1011. - PubMed
    1. Hallowell N. Doing the right thing: genetic risk and responsibility. Sociol Health Illn. 1999;21:597–621.
    1. Smith JA, Michie S, Stephenson M, Quarrell O. Risk perception and decision-making processes in candidates for genetic testing for Huntington's disease: an interpretative phenomenological analysis. J Health Psychol. 2002;7:131–144. - PubMed
    1. Etchegary H, Miller F, Delaat S, Wilson B, Carroll J, Cappelli M. Decision-making about inherited cancer risk: exploring dimensions of genetic responsibility. J Genet Couns. 2009;18:252–264. - PubMed

Publication types