Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2010 Jul;98(3):243-9.
doi: 10.3163/1536-5050.98.3.013.

Characteristics of personal health records: findings of the Medical Library Association/National Library of Medicine Joint Electronic Personal Health Record Task Force

Affiliations

Characteristics of personal health records: findings of the Medical Library Association/National Library of Medicine Joint Electronic Personal Health Record Task Force

Dixie A Jones et al. J Med Libr Assoc. 2010 Jul.

Abstract

Objectives: The Medical Library Association (MLA)/National Library of Medicine (NLM) Joint Electronic Personal Health Record Task Force examined the current state of personal health records (PHRs).

Methods: A working definition of PHRs was formulated, and a database was built with fields for specified PHR characteristics. PHRs were identified and listed. Each task force member was assigned a portion of the list for data gathering. Findings were recorded in the database.

Results: Of the 117 PHRs identified, 91 were viable. Almost half were standalone products. A number used national standards for nomenclature and/or record structure. Less than half were mobile device enabled. Some were publicly available, and others were offered only to enrollees of particular health plans or employees at particular institutions. A few were targeted to special health conditions.

Conclusions: The PHR field is very dynamic. While most PHR products have some common elements, their features can vary. PHRs can link their users with librarians and information resources. MLA and NLM have taken an active role in making this connection and in encouraging librarians to assume this assistance role with PHRs.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Personal health records (PHRs) integrated with electronic health records (n =  91)
Figure 2
Figure 2
PHRs with consumer health information (CHI) (n = 91)
Figure 3
Figure 3
PHRs on mobile devices (n = 91)

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Deloitte Consulting, Deloitte Center for Health Solutions. 2008 survey of health care consumers: executive summary [Internet] Washington, DC: Deloitte; 2008 [cited 27 Aug 2009]. < http://www.deloitte.com/assets/Dcom-UnitedStates/Local%20Assets/Document...>.
    1. Kaelber D.C, Shah S, Vincent A, Pan E, Hook J.M, Johnston D, Bates D.W, Middleton B. The value of personal health records [Internet] Charlestown, MA: Center for Information Technology Leadership; 2008 [cited 27 Aug 2009]. < http://www.citl.org/_pdf/CITL_PHR_Report.pdf>.
    1. Coffield R.L, DeLoss G.E, Mooty G.P. The rise of the personal health record: panacea or pitfall for health information. Health Lawyers News. 2008 Oct;12(10):8–13.
    1. Scherger J.E. Future vision: is family medicine ready for patient-directed care. Fam Med. 2009 Apr;41(4):285–8. - PubMed
    1. Kaelber D.C, Jha A.K, Johnston D, Middleton B, Bates D.W. A research agenda for personal health records (PHRs) J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2008 Nov–Dec;15(6):729–36. DOI 10.1197/jamia.M2547. - PMC - PubMed

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources