Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2010 Jul;128(1):EL49-55.
doi: 10.1121/1.3453415.

Differences in distortion product otoacoustic emission phase recorded from human neonates using two popular probes

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Differences in distortion product otoacoustic emission phase recorded from human neonates using two popular probes

Carolina Abdala et al. J Acoust Soc Am. 2010 Jul.

Abstract

DPOAE (2f(1)-f(2)) phase was measured across a 3-octave frequency range from two groups of newborns using ER10B+ and ER10C probe microphones. A marked phase shift was noted in the mid-to-high frequency range for newborn data recorded with the ER10C only. In contrast, the ER10B+ produced phase that was approximately invariant as a function of frequency for most of the range. Probe-related phase shifts can be effectively eliminated by correcting for variations in the phases of the primary tones. Results highlight the importance of detecting and correcting for system-related phase shifts so they are not misinterpreted as cochlear in origin.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Mean DPOAE phase (±1 SD) averaged into 1/8 octave frequency bins for two groups of newborns: 13 infants tested with the ER10C probe (squares) and a second group of 14 newborns tested with the ER10B+ probe (circles). NOTE: DPOAE phase was unwrapped starting at 500 Hz though only data points >800 Hz are displayed due to poor SNR at the lowest frequencies.
Figure 2
Figure 2
An example of four individual DPOAE phase vs. frequency functions from newborns tested with the ER10C probe.
Figure 3
Figure 3
The newborn phase data displayed in Fig. 1 are shown again in this graphic. The stippled region represents the corrected phase derived by subtracting 2ϕ12 from the estimated phase of the DPOAE, where ϕ1, ϕ2 are the measured phases of the two primary tones. The shaded region represents the uncorrected phase values. Because of the significant overlap, the two regions are staggered slightly for display purposes in the lower panel.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Mean DPOAE phase vs. frequency functions from 8 normal-hearing adults recorded with the ER10C probe (±1 SD). Data are shown corrected for variations in stimulus tone phases (stippled region) and in uncorrected form (shaded region).

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Abdala, C., and Dhar, S. (2010). “Distortion product otoacoustic emission (DPOAE) phase and component analysis in human newborns,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. JASMAN 127, 316–325.10.1121/1.3268611 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Dhar, S., and Abdala, C. (2007). “A comparative study of DPOAE fine structure in human newborns and adults with normal hearing,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. JASMAN 122, 2191–2202.10.1121/1.2770544 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Dhar, S., Talmadge, C. L., Long, G. R., and Tubis, A. (2002). “Multiple internal reflections in the cochlea and their effect on DPOAE fine structure,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. JASMAN 112, 2882–2897.10.1121/1.1516757 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Heitmann, J., Waldman, B., Schnitzler, H. U., Plinkert, P. K., and Zenner, H. P. (1998). “Suppression of distortion product otoacoustic emissions (DPOAE) near 2f1-f2 removes DP-gram fine structure—Evidence for a second generator,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. JASMAN 103, 1527–1531.10.1121/1.421290 - DOI
    1. Knight, R. D., and Kemp, D. T. (2001). “Wave and place fixed DPOAE maps of the human ear,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. JASMAN 109, 1513–1525.10.1121/1.1354197 - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms