Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2010 Jul;58(7):1241-8.
doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2010.02955.x.

A comparison of methods to communicate treatment preferences in nursing facilities: traditional practices versus the physician orders for life-sustaining treatment program

Susan E Hickman  1 , Christine A Nelson, Nancy A Perrin, Alvin H Moss, Bernard J Hammes, Susan W Tolle
Affiliations
Comparative Study

A comparison of methods to communicate treatment preferences in nursing facilities: traditional practices versus the physician orders for life-sustaining treatment program

Susan E Hickman et al. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2010 Jul.

Abstract

Objectives: To evaluate the relationship between two methods to communicate treatment preferences (Physician Orders for Life-Sustaining Treatment (POLST) program vs traditional practices) and documentation of life-sustaining treatment orders, symptom assessment and management, and use of life-sustaining treatments.

Design: Retrospective observational cohort study conducted between June 2006 and April 2007.

Setting: A stratified, random sample of 90 Medicaid-eligible nursing facilities in Oregon, Wisconsin, and West Virginia.

Participants: One thousand seven hundred eleven living and deceased nursing facility residents aged 65 and older with a minimum 60-day stay.

Measurements: Life-sustaining treatment orders; pain, shortness of breath, and related treatments over a 7-day period; and use of life-sustaining treatments over a 60-day period.

Results: Residents with POLST forms were more likely to have orders about life-sustaining treatment preferences beyond cardiopulmonary resuscitation than residents without (98.0% vs 16.1%, P<.001). There were no differences between residents with and without POLST forms in symptom assessment or management. Residents with POLST forms indicating orders for comfort measures only were less likely to receive medical interventions (e.g., hospitalization) than residents with POLST full treatment orders (P=.004), residents with traditional do-not-resuscitate orders (P<.001), or residents with traditional full code orders (P<.001).

Conclusion: Residents with POLST forms were more likely to have treatment preferences documented as medical orders than those who did not, but there were no differences in symptom management or assessment. POLST orders restricting medical interventions were associated with less use of life-sustaining treatments. Findings suggest that the POLST program offers significant advantages over traditional methods to communicate preferences about life-sustaining treatments.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interests: No competing financial interests exist. Drs. Hickman, Moss, Hammes, and Tolle are members of the National POLST Paradigm Task Force. Drs. Nelson and Tolle are members of the Oregon POLST Program Task Force.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Oregon POLST Form.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Fagerlin A, Schneider CE. Enough: The failure of the living will. Hastings Center Rep. 2004;34:30–42. - PubMed
    1. Hickman SE, Hammes BJ, Moss AH, et al. Hope for the future: Achieving the original intent of advance directives. Hastings Center Rep. 2005;35(6):S26–S30. - PubMed
    1. Teno JM, Licks S, Lynn J, et al. Do advance directives provide instructions that direct care? J Am Geriatr Soc. 1997;45:508–512. - PubMed
    1. Wilkinson A, Wenger N, Shugarman LR. Literature review on advance directives. Rand Corporation: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services; 2007. [Accessed on June 10, 2009]. http://aspe.hhs.gov/daltcp/reports/2007/advdirlr.htm.
    1. Teno J, Lynn J, Wenger N, et al. Advance directives for seriously ill hospitalized patients: effectiveness with the patient self-determination act and the SUPPORT intervention. J Am Geriatr Soc. 1997;45:500–507. - PubMed

Publication types