Analysis of barriers to and patients' preferences for CT colonography for colorectal cancer screening in a nonadherent urban population
- PMID: 20651195
- PMCID: PMC3717967
- DOI: 10.2214/AJR.09.3500
Analysis of barriers to and patients' preferences for CT colonography for colorectal cancer screening in a nonadherent urban population
Abstract
Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate patients' barriers against colorectal cancer screening tests and to assess patients' preferences and cost influences for CT colonography (CTC) in a nonadherent urban subpopulation.
Subjects and methods: Patients who had been offered colorectal cancer screening but were nonadherent were asked to participate in this questionnaire study. Patients' demographic information was obtained, and patients' reasons for not being screened were explored. Subjects were given an information sheet that described a CTC procedure and then were asked about their willingness to undergo CTC and about other relevant factors, such as fees.
Results: One hundred seventy-five patients were invited to participate; 53 declined and 54 did not respond, which left 68 subjects to be included in the analysis. After being informed about CTC screening, most (83%) subjects stated that they would be willing to undergo a CTC study. However, 70% stated that they would not be willing to pay out-of-pocket fees if insurance did not cover the study, and even among the 30% who were willing to pay the fees, the average amount they were willing to pay (mean, $244; median, $150) was well below currently charged rates.
Conclusion: Our study suggests that most nonadherent patients would be willing to undergo CTC as long as out-of-pocket fees are reasonable.
Similar articles
-
Willingness to Pay for CT Colonography: A Survey of Patient Preferences.AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2016 Feb;206(2):355-8. doi: 10.2214/AJR.15.14407. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2016. PMID: 26797363
-
Patient Preferences Regarding Colorectal Cancer Screening: Test Features and Cost Willing to Pay Out of Pocket.Curr Probl Diagn Radiol. 2016 May-Jun;45(3):189-92. doi: 10.1067/j.cpradiol.2015.12.002. Epub 2015 Dec 15. Curr Probl Diagn Radiol. 2016. PMID: 26774952 Review.
-
CT colonography may improve colorectal cancer screening compliance.AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2010 Nov;195(5):1118-23. doi: 10.2214/AJR.10.4921. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2010. PMID: 20966316
-
Is there sufficient MDCT capacity to provide colorectal cancer screening with CT colonography for the U.S. population?AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2008 Apr;190(4):1044-9. doi: 10.2214/AJR.07.3103. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2008. PMID: 18356453
-
CT colonography versus optical colonoscopy for screening asymptomatic patients for colorectal cancer a patient, intervention, comparison, outcome (PICO) analysis.Acad Radiol. 2009 May;16(5):564-71. doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2009.01.008. Acad Radiol. 2009. PMID: 19345897
Cited by
-
Why do some participants in colorectal cancer screening choose not to undergo colonoscopy following a positive test result? A qualitative study.Scand J Prim Health Care. 2018 Sep;36(3):262-271. doi: 10.1080/02813432.2018.1487520. Scand J Prim Health Care. 2018. PMID: 30238859 Free PMC article.
-
Evidence review and status update on computed tomography colonography.Curr Gastroenterol Rep. 2011 Oct;13(5):486-94. doi: 10.1007/s11894-011-0217-5. Curr Gastroenterol Rep. 2011. PMID: 21773705 Review.
-
Preference for colonoscopy versus computerized tomographic colonography: a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies.J Gen Intern Med. 2012 Oct;27(10):1349-60. doi: 10.1007/s11606-012-2115-4. Epub 2012 Jun 15. J Gen Intern Med. 2012. PMID: 22700393 Free PMC article.
-
Clinical indications for computed tomographic colonography: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) and European Society of Gastrointestinal and Abdominal Radiology (ESGAR) Guideline.Eur Radiol. 2015 Feb;25(2):331-45. doi: 10.1007/s00330-014-3435-z. Eur Radiol. 2015. PMID: 25278245 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Willingness to pay for colorectal cancer screening in Guangzhou.World J Gastroenterol. 2018 Nov 7;24(41):4708-4715. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v24.i41.4708. World J Gastroenterol. 2018. PMID: 30416318 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Jemal A, Siegel R, Ward E, et al. Cancer statistics, 2008. CA Cancer J Clin. 2008;58:71–96. - PubMed
-
- Smith RA, Cokkinides V, Brawley OW. Cancer screening in the United States, 2008: a review of current American Cancer Society guidelines and cancer screening issues. CA Cancer J Clin. 2008;58:161–179. - PubMed
-
- Fenlon HM, Nunes DP, Schroy PC, 3rd, Barish MA, Clarke PD, Ferrucci JT. A comparison of virtual and conventional colonoscopy for the detection of colorectal polyps. N Engl J Med. 1999;341:1496–1503. - PubMed
-
- Levin B, Lieberman DA, McFarland B, et al. American Cancer Society Colorectal Cancer Advisory Group. US Multi-Society Task Force. American College of Radiology Colon Cancer Committee Screening and surveillance for the early detection of colorectal cancer and adenomatous polyps, 2008: a joint guideline from the American Cancer Society, the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer, and the American College of Radiology. Gastroenterology. 2008;134:1570–1595. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical