Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2010 Jul-Aug;5(4):354-65.
doi: 10.1111/j.1747-0803.2010.00435.x.

To close or not to close: the very small patent ductus arteriosus

Affiliations
Review

To close or not to close: the very small patent ductus arteriosus

Elizabeth B Fortescue et al. Congenit Heart Dis. 2010 Jul-Aug.

Abstract

Patent ductus arteriosus (PDA) accounts for approximately 10% of all congenital heart diseases, with an incidence of at least 2-4 per 1000 term births. Closure of the large, hemodynamically significant PDA is established as the standard of care, and can be performed safely and effectively using either surgical or transcatheter methods. The appropriate management of the very small, hemodynamically insignificant PDA is less clear. Routine closure of such defects has been advocated to eliminate or reduce the risk of infective endocarditis (IE). However, the risk of IE in patients with a small PDA appears to be extremely low, and IE is treatable. Although closure of the small PDA is generally safe and technically successful, it is unknown whether this treatment truly improves the risk:benefit balance compared with observation. In this article, we review the published literature on the natural history and treatment outcomes in individuals with a PDA, the epidemiology and outcomes of IE, particularly in association with PDA, and the rationale and evidence for closure of the very small PDA.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Diameters of PDAs closed in the catheterization lab compared with those left open, Children’s Hospital Boston, January 2005–December 2009. *Includes six open PDAs reported as “trivial” or “small” (three each) without diameter reported. The solid bars represent open PDAs; the open bars closed PDAs. PDA, patent ductus arteriosus.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Hoffman JI, Kaplan S. The incidence of congenital heart disease. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2002;39:1890–900. - PubMed
    1. Brickner ME, Hillis LD, Lange RA. Congenital heart disease in adults. First of two parts. N Engl J Med. 2000;342:256–263. - PubMed
    1. Houston AB, Gnanpragasam JP, Lim MK, Doig WB, Coleman EN. Doppler ultrasound and the silent ductus arteriosus. Br Heart J. 1991;65:97–99. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Dickinson DF, Arnold R, Wilkinson JL. Congenital heart disease among 160,480 liveborn children in Liverpool 1960 to 1969. Implications for surgical treatment. Br Heart J. 1981;46:55–62. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Panagopoulos PG, Tatooles CJ, Aberdeen E, Waterston DJ, Carter REB. Patent ductus arteriosus in infants and children: a review of 936 operations (1946–1969) Thorax. 1971;26:137–144. - PMC - PubMed

MeSH terms