Why the Medical Research Council refused Robert Edwards and Patrick Steptoe support for research on human conception in 1971
- PMID: 20657027
- PMCID: PMC2922998
- DOI: 10.1093/humrep/deq155
Why the Medical Research Council refused Robert Edwards and Patrick Steptoe support for research on human conception in 1971
Abstract
Background: In 1971, Cambridge physiologist Robert Edwards and Oldham gynaecologist Patrick Steptoe applied to the UK Medical Research Council (MRC) for long-term support for a programme of scientific and clinical 'Studies on Human Reproduction'. The MRC, then the major British funder of medical research, declined support on ethical grounds and maintained this policy throughout the 1970s. The work continued with private money, leading to the birth of Louise Brown in 1978 and transforming research in obstetrics, gynaecology and human embryology.
Methods: The MRC decision has been criticized, but the processes by which it was reached have yet to be explored. Here, we present an archive-based analysis of the MRC decision.
Results: We find evidence of initial support for Edwards and Steptoe, including from within the MRC, which invited the applicants to join its new directly funded Clinical Research Centre at Northwick Park Hospital. They declined the offer, preferring long-term grant support at the University of Cambridge, and so exposed the project to competitive funding mode. Referees and the Clinical Research Board saw the institutional set-up in Cambridge as problematic with respect to clinical facilities and patient management; gave infertility a low priority compared with population control; assessed interventions as purely experimental rather than potential treatments, and so set the bar for safety high; feared fatal abnormalities and so wanted primate experiments first; and were antagonized by the applicants' high media profile. The rejection set MRC policy on IVF for 8 years, until, after the birth of just two healthy babies, the Council rapidly converted to enthusiastic support.
Conclusions: This analysis enriches our view of a crucial decision, highlights institutional opportunities and constraints and provides insight into the then dominant attitudes of reproductive scientists and clinicians towards human conception research.
Comment in
-
Human Reproduction. Editorial.Hum Reprod. 2010 Sep;25(9):2156. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deq156. Epub 2010 Jul 24. Hum Reprod. 2010. PMID: 20657026 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Biology: Changing the world--a tribute to Patrick Steptoe, Robert Edwards and Jean Purdy.Hum Fertil (Camb). 2015;18(4):232-3. doi: 10.3109/14647273.2015.1077657. Hum Fertil (Camb). 2015. PMID: 26646390
-
Thirty years of IVF: the legacy of Patrick Steptoe and Robert Edwards.Hum Fertil (Camb). 2009;12(3):137-43. doi: 10.1080/14647270903176773. Hum Fertil (Camb). 2009. PMID: 19925325
-
Looking into the Test Tube: The Birth of IVF on British Television.Med Hist. 2019 Apr;63(2):189-208. doi: 10.1017/mdh.2019.6. Med Hist. 2019. PMID: 30912501 Free PMC article.
-
In vitro fertilization in Japan - early days of in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer and future prospects for assisted reproductive technology.Proc Jpn Acad Ser B Phys Biol Sci. 2014;90(5):184-201. doi: 10.2183/pjab.90.184. Proc Jpn Acad Ser B Phys Biol Sci. 2014. PMID: 24814992 Free PMC article. Review.
-
The early days of IVF outside the UK.Hum Reprod Update. 2005 Sep-Oct;11(5):439-59. doi: 10.1093/humupd/dmi016. Epub 2005 May 27. Hum Reprod Update. 2005. PMID: 15923202 Review.
Cited by
-
From Embryos to Adults: A DOHaD Perspective on In Vitro Fertilization and Other Assisted Reproductive Technologies.Healthcare (Basel). 2016 Aug 9;4(3):51. doi: 10.3390/healthcare4030051. Healthcare (Basel). 2016. PMID: 27517965 Free PMC article.
-
IVF: The women who helped make it happen.Reprod Biomed Soc Online. 2018 Dec 14;8:1-6. doi: 10.1016/j.rbms.2018.11.002. eCollection 2019 Jun. Reprod Biomed Soc Online. 2018. PMID: 30723816 Free PMC article.
-
The Oldham Notebooks: an analysis of the development of IVF 1969-1978. II. The treatment cycles and their outcomes.Reprod Biomed Soc Online. 2015 Jun;1(1):9-18. doi: 10.1016/j.rbms.2015.04.003. Reprod Biomed Soc Online. 2015. PMID: 28299361 Free PMC article.
-
The Oldham Notebooks: an analysis of the development of IVF 1969-1978. I. Introduction, materials and methods.Reprod Biomed Soc Online. 2015 Jun;1(1):3-8. doi: 10.1016/j.rbms.2015.04.001. Reprod Biomed Soc Online. 2015. PMID: 28299360 Free PMC article.
-
'The men who made the breakthrough': How the British press represented Patrick Steptoe and Robert Edwards in 1978.Reprod Biomed Soc Online. 2017 Aug 16;4:59-67. doi: 10.1016/j.rbms.2017.07.002. eCollection 2017 Jun. Reprod Biomed Soc Online. 2017. PMID: 29774267 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Alexandre H. A history of mammalian embryological research. Int J Dev Biol. 2001;45:457–467. - PubMed
-
- Anon. Conception in a watch glass. N Engl J Med. 1937;217:678–679.
-
- Anon. Culture of early human embryos is imminent. World Med. 1965;1:19–21.
-
- Anon. Controlling the sex of offspring. The Times. 1968;(26 April):4.
-
- Anon. Test-tube baby work likely to go on despite U.S. criticisms. Cambridge Evening News. 1971a;(18 October):10.