Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2010 May 5:4:96-102.
doi: 10.2174/1874613601004010096.

Measuring the Quality of Data Collection in a Large Observational Cohort of HIV and AIDS

Mariska Hillebregt  1 , Elly de Lange-de Klerk, Dirk Knol, Frank de Wolf, Colette Smit
Affiliations

Measuring the Quality of Data Collection in a Large Observational Cohort of HIV and AIDS

Mariska Hillebregt et al. Open AIDS J. .

Abstract

The aim of this study was to examine the quality of data collection by studying the validity of collected data. Data were extracted from the clinic charts of two anonymous outpatients by 38 data collectors. A standard for the data to be collected was determined (168 items). The validity was measured by comparing the collected items with the standard; in this way, the percentages of the collected items that were 'correct' could be calculated. The percentage 'correct' was higher for clinic chart 1 (mean: 83% correct, SD 7%) than for clinic chart 2 (mean: 78% correct, SD 8%). All categories contained incorrectly collected data. These data were divided into missing data, incorrect start-stop dates, and surplus collected data. Almost all start-stop dates would change into 'correct' if 'monthyear' was considered correct (instead of the standard 'daymonthyear'). Not all data collectors used specific protocols, and sources other than the written comments were not always checked. This study shows that a high proportion of data was correctly collected. However, the collection of start-stop dates was not optimal, and the collected data included surplus and missing data. Data collectors should be more knowledgeable about HIV disease and trained in the use of difficult protocols, so that they can better recognize what data to collect and how it should be collected. Among physicians, there should be more agreement about what information to record in the charts, to facilitate data extraction for data collectors.

Keywords: Database; HIV/AIDS.; manual data entry; quality of data collection.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. The UK Collaborative HIV Cohort Steering Committee. The creation of a large UK-based multicentre cohort of HIV-infected individuals: The UK Collaborative HIV Cohort (UK CHIC) Study. HIV Med. 2004;5:115–24. - PubMed
    1. Schneider JK, Deenan A. Reducing quantitative data errors: tips for clinical researchers. Appl Nurs Res. 2004;17:125–29. - PubMed
    1. Favalli G, Vermorken JB, Vantongelen K, Renard J, Van Oosterom AT, Pecorelli S. Quality control in multicentric clinical trials. An experience of the EORTC Gynecological Cancer Cooperative Group. Eur J Cancer. 2000;36:1125–33. - PubMed
    1. Cassidy LD, Marsh GM, Holleran MK, Ruhl LS. Methodology to improve data quality from chart review in the managed care setting. Am J Manag Care. 2002;8:787–93. - PubMed
    1. Mullooly JP. The effects of data entry error: an analysis of partial verification. Comput Biomed Res. 1990;23:259–67. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources