Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2010 Oct;40(2):205-17.
doi: 10.1007/s12160-010-9215-3.

Examining the role of perceived susceptibility on colorectal cancer screening intention and behavior

Affiliations

Examining the role of perceived susceptibility on colorectal cancer screening intention and behavior

Amy McQueen et al. Ann Behav Med. 2010 Oct.

Abstract

Although support exists for multiple psychosocial predictors of colorectal cancer (CRC) screening, little is known about the relationships among these variables. Understanding the associations between such predictors could refine health behavior theories and inform the design of interventions. In addition to direct effects, we examined whether baseline perceived susceptibility was a moderator of, or was mediated by, changes in other psychosocial determinants of CRC screening intention and behavior. Longitudinal path models were tested using data from 1,001 white male automotive workers who participated in The Next Step Trial. Our sample included workers with no history of CRC who were due for CRC screening but did not complete CRC screening prior to the assessment of hypothesized mediators at year 1 follow-up. Perceived susceptibility interacted differently with four psychosocial constructs in models predicting CRC screening intention or behavior. Perceived susceptibility was independent of perceived benefits, moderated the change in perceived barriers and self-efficacy, and was mediated by the change in family influence. The role of perceived susceptibility was not limited to direct effects but involved mediating and moderating pathways of influence.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Models illustrating perceived susceptibility as an indirect effect of the change in a psychosocial variable on colorectal cancer screening (CRCS) intention or behavior (path 1* path 2) and as a moderator of change in a psychosocial variable (path 3) while accounting for the direct effect (path 4) and potential covariates. Models were repeated for each psychosocial (perceived benefits, barriers, self-efficacy, and family influence) and outcome variable. Legend: BL = baseline, Y1 = Year 1, Y2 = Year 2, CRC = colorectal cancer, CRCS = CRC screening

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. American Cancer Society. Cancer facts and figures 2009. Atlanta, GA: American Cancer Society; 2009.
    1. Winawer SJ, Zauber AG, Ho MN, et al. Prevention of colorectal cancer by colonoscopic polypectomy. The National Polyp Study Workgroup. N Engl J Med. 1993;329:1977–1981. - PubMed
    1. Levin B, Lieberman DA, McFarland B, et al. Screening and surveillance for the early detection of colorectal cancer and adenomatous polyps, 2008: A joint guideline from the American Cancer Society, the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer, and the American College of Radiology. CA Cancer J Clin. 2008;58:130–160. - PubMed
    1. U. S. Preventive Services Task Force. Screening for colorectal cancer: U.S. Preventive Task Force recommendation. Ann Intern Med. 2008;149:627–637. - PubMed
    1. Meissner HI, Breen NL, Klabunde CN, Vernon SW. Patterns of colorectal cancer screening uptake among men and women in the US. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2006;15:389–394. - PubMed

Publication types