Prediction of success of external cephalic version after 36 weeks
- PMID: 20661845
- DOI: 10.1055/s-0030-1262909
Prediction of success of external cephalic version after 36 weeks
Abstract
We aimed to develop a predictive model for the chance of a successful external cephalic version (ECV). We performed a prospective cohort study of women with a singleton fetus in breech presentation with a gestational age of 36 weeks or more. Data on parity, maternal age, body mass index, ethnicity, gestational age, placental location, fetal position, estimated fetal weight, and amniotic fluid were recorded in all participants. Multivariable logistic regression analysis with a stepwise backward selection procedure was used to construct a prediction model for the occurrence of successful ECV. We included a total of 310 women. Multivariable logistic regression analysis demonstrated that multiparity, increasing estimated fetal weight, and normal amniotic fluid were favorable predictors of successful ECV. Anterior placenta location was an unfavorable predictor for ECV outcome. Discrimination of the model was fair (area under the curve 0.71), and the calibration of the model was acceptable. Our prediction model appears to discriminate between women with a poor chance of successful ECV (less than 20%) and women with a good chance of success (more than 60%). When this model is validated externally, it could be used for patient counseling and clinical decision making.
© Thieme Medical Publishers.
Similar articles
-
Prognostic parameters for successful external cephalic version.J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2008 Sep;21(9):660-2. doi: 10.1080/14767050802244938. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2008. PMID: 18828059
-
External validation of a prediction model for successful external cephalic version.Am J Perinatol. 2012 Mar;29(3):231-6. doi: 10.1055/s-0031-1285098. Epub 2011 Aug 1. Am J Perinatol. 2012. PMID: 21809265
-
Predictors of successful external cephalic version in an Australian maternity hospital.Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2014 Feb;54(1):59-63. doi: 10.1111/ajo.12152. Epub 2013 Dec 23. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2014. PMID: 24359099
-
External cephalic version among women with a previous cesarean delivery: report on 36 cases and review of the literature.J Perinat Med. 2009;37(2):156-60. doi: 10.1515/JPM.2009.006. J Perinat Med. 2009. PMID: 19021458 Review.
-
Ultrasound factors to predict the outcome of external cephalic version: a meta-analysis.Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2009 Jan;33(1):76-84. doi: 10.1002/uog.6277. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2009. PMID: 19115237 Review.
Cited by
-
Height of elevated fetal buttock for prediction of successful external cephalic version.Obstet Gynecol Sci. 2020 Jan;63(1):13-18. doi: 10.5468/ogs.2020.63.1.13. Epub 2019 Dec 20. Obstet Gynecol Sci. 2020. PMID: 31970123 Free PMC article.
-
Effect of regional anesthesia on the success rate of external cephalic version: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Obstet Gynecol. 2011 Nov;118(5):1137-1144. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e3182324583. Obstet Gynecol. 2011. PMID: 22015882 Free PMC article.
-
Applying the Newman-Peacock Prognostic System to a Portuguese Obstetrical Population - A Useful Tool?Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet. 2018 Jan;40(1):4-10. doi: 10.1055/s-0037-1606243. Epub 2017 Aug 28. Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet. 2018. PMID: 28847027 Free PMC article.
-
Reviving external cephalic version: a review of its efficacy, safety, and technical aspects.Obstet Gynecol Sci. 2019 Nov;62(6):371-381. doi: 10.5468/ogs.2019.62.6.371. Epub 2019 Oct 8. Obstet Gynecol Sci. 2019. PMID: 31777732 Free PMC article. Review.
-
A prospective study using an individualized nomogram to predict the success rate of external cephalic version.Sci Rep. 2022 Jul 12;12(1):11795. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-16112-7. Sci Rep. 2022. PMID: 35821248 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources