Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2010 Jul 27:10:440.
doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-10-440.

Reforming sanitary-epidemiological service in Central and Eastern Europe and the former Soviet Union: an exploratory study

Affiliations
Review

Reforming sanitary-epidemiological service in Central and Eastern Europe and the former Soviet Union: an exploratory study

George Gotsadze et al. BMC Public Health. .

Abstract

Background: Public health services in the Soviet Union and its satellite states in Central and Eastern Europe were delivered through centrally planned and managed networks of sanitary-epidemiological (san-epid) facilities. Many countries sought to reform this service following the political transition in the 1990s. In this paper we describe the major themes within these reforms.

Methods: A review of literature was conducted. A conceptual framework was developed to guide the review, which focused on the two traditional core public health functions of the san-epid system: communicable disease surveillance, prevention and control and environmental health. The review included twenty-two former communist countries in the former Soviet Union (fSU) and in Central and Eastern Europe (CEE).

Results: The countries studied fall into two broad groups. Reforms were more extensive in the CEE countries than in the fSU. The CEE countries have moved away from the former centrally managed san-epid system, adopting a variety of models of decentralization. The reformed systems remain mainly funded centrally level, but in some countries there are contributions by local government. In almost all countries, epidemiological surveillance and environmental monitoring remained together under a single organizational umbrella but in a few responsibilities for environmental health have been divided among different ministries.

Conclusions: Progress in reform of public health services has varied considerably. There is considerable scope to learn from the differing experiences but also a need for rigorous evaluation of how public health functions are provided.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Conceptual Framework.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Glass RI. The Sanepid Service in the U.S.S.R. Public Health Rep. 1976;91:154–158. - PMC - PubMed
    1. McKee M, Zatonski W. In: Global Public Health. Beaglehole R, editor. Oxford University Press; 2003. Public health in eastern Europe and the former Soviet Union; pp. 87–104.
    1. Markina S, Maksimova N, Vitek C, Bogatyreva E, Monisov A. Diphtheria in the Russian Federation in the 1990s. J Infect Dis. 2000;181(Suppl 1):S27–34. doi: 10.1086/315535. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Vatandoost H, Ashraf H, Lak SH, Mahdi RE, Abai MR, Nazari M. Factors involved in the re-emergence of malaria in borderline of Iran, Armenia, Azerbaijan and Turkey. Southeast Asian J Trop Med Public Health. 2003;34(Suppl 2):6–14. - PubMed
    1. Atun R, McKee M, Drobniewski F, Coker RJ. Analysis of how the health systems context shapes responses to control of the human immunodeficiency virus: case studies from the Russian Federation. Bull WHO. 2005;83:730–738. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources