Vulnerability of eco-environmental health to climate change: the views of government stakeholders and other specialists in Queensland, Australia
- PMID: 20663227
- PMCID: PMC2919479
- DOI: 10.1186/1471-2458-10-441
Vulnerability of eco-environmental health to climate change: the views of government stakeholders and other specialists in Queensland, Australia
Abstract
Background: There is overwhelming scientific evidence that human activities have changed and will continue to change the climate of the Earth. Eco-environmental health, which refers to the interdependencies between ecological systems and population health and well-being, is likely to be significantly influenced by climate change. The aim of this study was to examine perceptions from government stakeholders and other relevant specialists about the threat of climate change, their capacity to deal with it, and how to develop and implement a framework for assessing vulnerability of eco-environmental health to climate change.
Methods: Two focus groups were conducted in Brisbane, Australia with representatives from relevant government agencies, non-governmental organisations, and the industry sector (n = 15) involved in the discussions. The participants were specialists on climate change and public health from governmental agencies, industry, and non-governmental organisations in South-East Queensland.
Results: The specialists perceived climate change to be a threat to eco-environmental health and had substantial knowledge about possible implications and impacts. A range of different methods for assessing vulnerability were suggested by the participants and the complexity of assessment when dealing with multiple hazards was acknowledged. Identified factors influencing vulnerability were perceived to be of a social, physical and/or economic nature. They included population growth, the ageing population with associated declines in general health and changes in the vulnerability of particular geographical areas due to for example, increased coastal development, and financial stress. Education, inter-sectoral collaboration, emergency management (e.g. development of early warning systems), and social networks were all emphasised as a basis for adapting to climate change. To develop a framework, different approaches were discussed for assessing eco-environmental health vulnerability, including literature reviews to examine the components of vulnerability such as natural hazard risk and exposure and to investigate already existing frameworks for assessing vulnerability.
Conclusion: The study has addressed some important questions in regard to government stakeholders and other specialists' views on the threat of climate change and its potential impacts on eco-environmental health. These findings may have implications in climate change and public health decision-making.
Similar articles
-
Assessing the vulnerability of eco-environmental health to climate change.Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2010 Feb;7(2):546-64. doi: 10.3390/ijerph7020546. Epub 2010 Feb 12. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2010. PMID: 20616990 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Priority focus areas for a sub-national response to climate change and health: A South African provincial case study.Environ Int. 2019 Jan;122:31-51. doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2018.11.035. Epub 2018 Dec 18. Environ Int. 2019. PMID: 30573189 Review.
-
Fuzzy-based vulnerability assessment of coupled social-ecological systems to multiple environmental hazards and climate change.J Environ Manage. 2021 Dec 1;299:113573. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.113573. Epub 2021 Sep 3. J Environ Manage. 2021. PMID: 34482110
-
I-C-SEA Change: A participatory tool for rapid assessment of vulnerability of tropical coastal communities to climate change impacts.Ambio. 2015 Dec;44(8):718-36. doi: 10.1007/s13280-015-0652-x. Epub 2015 Jun 3. Ambio. 2015. PMID: 26036847 Free PMC article.
-
Risk management frameworks for human health and environmental risks.J Toxicol Environ Health B Crit Rev. 2003 Nov-Dec;6(6):569-720. doi: 10.1080/10937400390208608. J Toxicol Environ Health B Crit Rev. 2003. PMID: 14698953 Review.
Cited by
-
Rapid warming in Tibet, China: public perception, response and coping resources in urban Lhasa.Environ Health. 2013 Aug 27;12(1):71. doi: 10.1186/1476-069X-12-71. Environ Health. 2013. PMID: 24103412 Free PMC article.
-
Ecosystem Approaches to Community Health and Wellbeing: Towards an Integrated Australian Governance Framework in Response to Global Environmental Change.Ecohealth. 2017 Jun;14(2):210-213. doi: 10.1007/s10393-016-1193-x. Epub 2016 Oct 28. Ecohealth. 2017. PMID: 27796674 No abstract available.
References
-
- Costello A, Abbas M, Allen A, Bell S, Bellamy R, Friel S, Groce N, Johnson A, Kett M, Lee M, Levy C, Maslin M, McCoy D, McGuire B, Montgomery H, Napier D, Pagel C, Patel J, Oliveira JAPd, Redclift N, Rees H, Rogger D, Scott J, Stephenson J, Twigg J, Wolff J, Patterson C. Managing the health effects of climate change. Lancet. 2009;373:1693–1734. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(09)60935-1. - DOI - PubMed
-
- IPCC. Fourth assessment report. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change; 2007.
-
- Grootjans J, Townsend M, Butler C, Heyworth J. In: Sustainability and health: supporting global ecological integrity in public health. Brown V, Grootjans J, Ritchie J, Townsend M, Verrinder G, editor. Crows Nest, NSW: Allen & Unwin; 2005. Listening: Co-ordinating ideas on sustainability and health; pp. 39–59.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical