Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2010 Jul 23;5(7):e11745.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0011745.

Persistence of pathogens with short infectious periods in seasonal tick populations: the relative importance of three transmission routes

Affiliations

Persistence of pathogens with short infectious periods in seasonal tick populations: the relative importance of three transmission routes

Etsuko Nonaka et al. PLoS One. .

Abstract

Background: The flaviviruses causing tick-borne encephalitis (TBE) persist at low but consistent levels in tick populations, despite short infectious periods in their mammalian hosts and transmission periods constrained by distinctly seasonal tick life cycles. In addition to systemic and vertical transmission, cofeeding transmission has been proposed as an important route for the persistence of TBE-causing viruses. Because cofeeding transmission requires ticks to feed simultaneously, the timing of tick activity may be critical to pathogen persistence. Existing models of tick-borne diseases do not incorporate all transmission routes and tick seasonality. Our aim is to evaluate the influence of seasonality on the relative importance of different transmission routes by using a comprehensive mathematical model.

Methodology/principal findings: We developed a stage-structured population model that includes tick seasonality and evaluated the relative importance of the transmission routes for pathogens with short infectious periods, in particular Powassan virus (POWV) and the related "deer tick virus," emergent encephalitis-causing flaviviruses in North America. We used the next generation matrix method to calculate the basic reproductive ratio and performed elasticity analyses. We confirmed that cofeeding transmission is critically important for such pathogens to persist in seasonal tick populations over the reasonable range of parameter values. At higher but still plausible rates of vertical transmission, our model suggests that vertical transmission can strongly enhance pathogen prevalence when it operates in combination with cofeeding transmission.

Conclusions/significance: Our results demonstrate that the consistent prevalence of POWV observed in tick populations could be maintained by a combination of low vertical, intermediate cofeeding and high systemic transmission rates. When vertical transmission is weak, nymphal ticks support integral parts of the transmission cycle that are critical for maintaining the pathogen. We also extended the model to pathogens that cause chronic infections in hosts and found that cofeeding transmission could contribute to elevating prevalence even in these systems. Therefore, the common assumption that cofeeding transmission is not relevant in models of chronic host infection, such as Lyme disease, could lead to underestimating pathogen prevalence.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. The typical life cycle of the black-legged or deer tick (Ixodes scapularis).
The light grey arrows represent the first year, and the dark grey arrows indicate the second year. The dotted areas on the arrows indicate the time period where two cohorts can overlap. Larvae emerge in mid to late summer and quest for 3–4 months and then moult followed by diapause in fall until next spring. The nymphs emerge in late spring and quest for 3–4 months before they moult into adults in fall. The adults emerge in fall and quest until late spring except during the coldest months when they undergo diapause. The larvae and nymphs usually feed on small mammals, mainly rodents, for blood meals, while the adults feed on larger mammals such as deer. The figure is based on Fig. 1 in . Temporal dynamics of the tick and host populations from a typical run of the model is presented in Fig. S1.
Figure 2
Figure 2. Pathogen prevalence in adult ticks in October with one route turned off at a time.
The figures in the top row show the cases when the two cohorts (larvae and nymphs) overlap, and the bottom row show the cases when they do not overlap: without vertical transmission (formula image = 0; A, D), without cofeeding transmission (all formula image's = 0; B, E), and without systemic transmission (formula image and formula image = 0; C, F). The blank colour means prevalence = 0. Cofeeding transmission is expressed as the multiples of the baseline rates (0.24 and 0.72). Neither vertical nor systemic transmission along can maintain the pathogen, while cofeeding transmission is necessary and can be sufficient by itself to sustain the pathogen in the tick population. The corresponding figures for R0 values are presented in Fig. S2.
Figure 3
Figure 3. Relative importance of the three transmission routes.
Elasticity values when two cohorts overlap for vertical (A, D), cofeeding (B, E), and systemic transmission (C,F) with the vertical transmission rate(formula image) = 0.001, with inter-cohort overlap (A, B, C) and without (D, E, F). In both cases, relative importance of the three routes varies over the parameter space, notably cofeeding and systemic transmission exchanging relative importance as the baseline cofeeding transmission rate increases (Fig. 3B, C, E, F). Cohort overlap did not qualitatively change the results, but vertical transmission increased its relative importance by 10–15% (Fig. 3A,D).
Figure 4
Figure 4. Relative importance of the input parameters.
Elasticity values of the input parameters with inter-cohort overlap (A, B) and without overlap (C, D). Case 1 – lower vertical and higher cofeeding transmission – the parameters related to nymphs have much higher elasticities, indicating that nymphs play the critical role in determining R0. The cofeeing transmission parameter (formula image) has high elasticity, and it is dominated by the pathway from nymphs to larvae (formula image). Case 2 – higher vertical and lower cofeeding transmission – the parameters for larvae increase elasticities.
Figure 5
Figure 5. Prevalence of the pathogen with and without inter-cohort overlap for adults (A, B) and nymphs (C).
5A and 5B show the prevalence in adult ticks in October with inter-cohort overlap and without overlap, respectively. 5C shows the prevalence in nymphs in July with overlap. Systemic transmission is set at 0.9. These figures suggest that low, steady prevalence (>0–5%) in tick-borne flaviviruses could be maintained by low vertical, intermediate cofeeing, and high systemic transmission rates.
Figure 6
Figure 6. The proposed major transmission paths based on the elasticity analysis.
The relative thickness of arrows qualitatively reflects the magnitudes of elasticity. When cohorts with the vertical transmission rate at 0.1% overlap (A), inter-cohort cofeeding transmission serves as the major route. With higher vertical transmission (1%), in addition to the above route, the importance of the two intra-cohort cofeeding transmission routes increases (B). When inter-cohort overlap is removed, the larva-nymph cofeeding route disappears, and the intra-cohort routes will maintain the pathogen with increased importance of the survival of the pathogen within ticks (C).
Figure 7
Figure 7. Relative importance of the three transmission routes with varied host recovery rates (γ).
Relative importance of the three transmission routes with varied host recovery rates (γ); A) vertical, B) cofeeding, and C) systemic transmission. Cofeeding transmission rate was varied on the y-axis as described in the main text and specified in Table 1 and Table S1. Vertical transmission rate = 0.001 and systemic transmission rate = 0.9. Note that the scale of the x-axes is not linear. These figures suggest that the contributions from cofeeding transmission to pathogen persistence can be substantial even for pathogens with long infectious periods.
Figure 8
Figure 8. The effects of recovery rates on pathogen prevalence in adult ticks in October.
Pathogen prevalence under longer infectious periods; A) about 4 months (γ = 0.03), B) chronic infection (γ = 0.001). Cofeeding and vertical transmission rates were varied, and systemic transmission was set at 0.9. Even when infection is chronic in hosts, cofeeding transmission can elevate prevalence. Recovery rates have larger effects when the cofeeding transmission rate is low. 8C shows prevalence of a pathogen that causes chronic infections in its host and has a relatively high vertical transmission rate, such as the agent of Lyme disease (the x-axis goes from 0 to 0.2 for this panel).

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Sumilo D, Bormane A, Asokliene L, Vasilenko V, Golovjova I, et al. Socio-economic factors in the differential upsurge of tick-borne encephalitis in central and eastern Europe. Reviews in Medical Virology. 2008;18:81–95. - PubMed
    1. Süss J. Tick-borne encephalitis in Europe and beyond – the epidemiological situation as of 2007. Eurosurveillance. 2008;13:1–8. - PubMed
    1. Mansfield KL, Johnson N, Phipps LP, Stephenson JR, Fooks AR, et al. Tick-borne encephalitis virus - a review of an emerging zoonosis. Journal of General Virology. 2009;90:1781–1794. - PubMed
    1. Hinten SR, Beckett GA, Gensheimer KF, Pritchard E, Courtney TM, et al. Increased recognition of Powassan encephalitis in the United States, 1999–2005. Vector-borne and Zoonotic Diseases. 2008;8:733–740. - PubMed
    1. Tavakoli NP, Wang H, Dupuis M, Hull R, Ebel GD, et al. Brief report: fatal case of deer tick virus encephalitis. New England Journal of Medicine. 2009;360:2099–2107. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms