Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2009 Jul;15(2):148-54.
doi: 10.4103/0973-1075.58462.

Pattern of palliative care, pain management and referral trends in patients receiving radiotherapy at a tertiary cancer center

Affiliations

Pattern of palliative care, pain management and referral trends in patients receiving radiotherapy at a tertiary cancer center

Kuldeep Sharma et al. Indian J Palliat Care. 2009 Jul.

Abstract

Background: Pain is a common primary symptom of advanced cancer and metastatic disease, occurring in 50-75% of all patients. Although palliative care and pain management are essential components in oncology practice, studies show that these areas are often inadequately addressed.

Materials and methods: We randomly selected 152 patients receiving palliative radiotherapy (PRT) from October 2006 to August 2008, excluding metastatic bone lesions. Patients' records were studied retrospectively.

Results: A median follow-up of 21 weeks was available for 119 males and 33 females with a median age of 55 years. Maximum (60%) patients were of head and neck cancers followed by esophagus (14%), lung (10%) and others. Dysphagia, growth/ulcer and pain were the chief indications for PRT. Pain was present in 93 (61%) cases out of which, 56 (60%) were referred to pain clinic. All except one consulted pain clinic with a median pain score of 8 (0-10 point scale). Fifty-three of these 56 patients (96%) received opioid-based treatment with adequate pain relief in 33% cases and loss of follow-up in 40% cases. Only five (3%) cases were referred to a hospice. Twenty-two (14%) cases were considered for radical treatment following excellent response to PRT.

Conclusion: In this selective sample, the standard of analgesic treatment was found to be satisfactory. However, there is a lot of scope for improvement regarding referral to pain clinic and later to the hospice. Patients' follow-up needs to be improved along with future studies evaluating those patients who were considered for further RT till radical dose. Programs to change the patients' attitude towards palliative care, physicians' (residents') training to improve communication skills, and institutional policies may be promising strategies.

Keywords: Cancer pain; Palliative care; Palliative radiotherapy; Referral pattern.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest: None declared.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Fallon M. When morphine does not work. Support Care Cancer. 2008;16:771–5. - PubMed
    1. Beyeler CM, Bernhard J, Rufibach K, Morant R, Schmid HP. Quality of analgesic treatment in patients with advanced prostate cancer: Do we do a better job now? The Swiss Group for Clinical Cancer Research (SAKK) experience. Support Care Cancer. 2008;16:461–7. - PubMed
    1. Salminen E, Clemens KE, Syrjanen K, Salmenoja H. Needs of developing the skills of palliative care at the oncology ward: An audit of symptoms among 203 consecutive cancer patients in Finland. Support Cancer Care. 2008;16:3–8. - PubMed
    1. Fainsinger RL, Nekolaichuk CL. A “TNM” classification system for cancer pain: The Edmonton Classification System for Pain (ECS-CP) Support Care Cancer. 2008;16:547–55. - PubMed
    1. Dumont I, Dumont S. Continuity of care for advanced cancer patients. J Palliat Care. 2005;21:49–56. - PubMed