Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2010 Sep;16(5):754-60.
doi: 10.1017/S1355617710000706. Epub 2010 Aug 2.

Selective review of cognitive aging

Affiliations
Review

Selective review of cognitive aging

Timothy A Salthouse. J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2010 Sep.

Abstract

Research concerned with relations between adult age and cognitive functioning is briefly reviewed. The coverage is necessarily selective, and is organized in terms of five major questions. These are what abilities are related to age, how many distinct influences are contributing to the relations between age and cognitive functioning, do the differences between people increase with advancing age, what is responsible for the discrepancies between cross-sectional and longitudinal age comparisons of cognitive functioning, and what methods can be used to identify causes of age-related influences on cognition. Although definitive answers are not yet possible, quite a bit of information relevant to the questions is now available. Moreover, the existing information has implications for the design, analysis, and interpretation of cognitive and neuropsychological research concerned with aging.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The information in this manuscript has not been previously published, and the author has no conflicts of interest.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Means and standard errors for composite scores in five abilities as a function of age based on data from studies by Salthouse and colleagues (e.g., Salthouse, 2009a). Sample sizes ranged from 2369 to 4149.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Means and standard errors for scores on various neuropsychological tests based on data from studies by Salthouse and colleagues (e.g., Salthouse, Atkinson, & Berish, 2003; Salthouse, Fristoe, & Rhee, 1996; Salthouse & Meinz, 1995; Salthouse, Pink, & Tucker-Drob, 2008). Sample sizes ranged from 269 to 1455.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Mean T-scores for various cognitive test scores as a function of age (left panel) and standard deviations of the scores as a function of age (right panel). Data from Ronnlund and colleagues (2005, 2006), and from Schaie (2005).
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Means and standard errors for composite memory scores at two test occasions and for a new sample tested at the second occasion, based on data from Ronnlund and colleagues (2005).

References

    1. Baron RM, Kenny DA. The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1986;51:1173–1182. - PubMed
    1. Borella E, Carretti B, De Beni R. Working memory and inhibition across the adult life-span. Acta Psychologica. 2008;128:33–44. - PubMed
    1. Bugg JM, Zook NA, DeLosh EL, Davalos DB, Davis HP. Age differences in fluid intelligence: Contributions of general slowing and frontal decline. Brain and Cognition. 2006;62:9–16. - PubMed
    1. Cabeza R, Nyberg L, Park D, editors. Cognitive neuroscience of aging: Linking cognitive and cerebral aging. New York: Oxford University Press; 2005.
    1. Cattell RB. The measurement of adult intelligence. Psychological Bulletin. 1943;40:153–193.

Publication types