What breaks a melody: perceiving F0 and intensity sequences with a cochlear implant
- PMID: 20674733
- DOI: 10.1016/j.heares.2010.07.007
What breaks a melody: perceiving F0 and intensity sequences with a cochlear implant
Abstract
Pitch perception has been extensively studied using discrimination tasks on pairs of single sounds. When comparing pitch discrimination performance for normal-hearing (NH) and cochlear implant (CI) listeners, it usually appears that CI users have relatively poor pitch discrimination. Tasks involving pitch sequences, such as melody perception or auditory scene analysis, are also usually difficult for CI users. However, it is unclear whether the issue with pitch sequences is a consequence of sound discriminability, or if an impairment exists for sequence processing per se. Here, we compared sequence processing abilities across stimulus dimensions (fundamental frequency and intensity) and listener groups (NH, CI, and NH listeners presented with noise-vocoded sequences). The sequence elements were firstly matched in discriminability, for each listener and dimension. Participants were then presented with pairs of sequences, constituted by up to four elements varying on a single dimension, and they performed a same/different task. In agreement with a previous study (Cousineau et al., 2009) fundamental frequency sequences were processed more accurately than intensity sequences by NH listeners. However, this was not the case for CI listeners, nor for NH listeners presented with noise-vocoded sequences. Intensity sequence processing was, nonetheless, equally accurate in the three groups. These results show that the reduced pitch cues received by CI listeners do not only elevate thresholds, as previously documented, but also affect pitch sequence processing above threshold. We suggest that efficient sequence processing for pitch requires the resolution of individual harmonics in the auditory periphery, which is not achieved with the current generation of implants.
Similar articles
-
Music perception of cochlear implant users compared with that of hearing aid users.Ear Hear. 2008 Jun;29(3):421-34. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0b013e31816a0d0b. Ear Hear. 2008. PMID: 18344870
-
Training of cochlear implant users to improve pitch perception in the presence of competing place cues.Ear Hear. 2015 Mar-Apr;36(2):e1-e13. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000000109. Ear Hear. 2015. PMID: 25329372 Clinical Trial.
-
Pitch ranking of complex tones by normally hearing subjects and cochlear implant users.Hear Res. 2007 Aug;230(1-2):80-7. doi: 10.1016/j.heares.2007.05.002. Epub 2007 May 24. Hear Res. 2007. PMID: 17604582
-
Cochlear implant-mediated perception of music.Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2006 Oct;14(5):337-40. doi: 10.1097/01.moo.0000244192.59184.bd. Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2006. PMID: 16974148 Review.
-
Current research on music perception in cochlear implant users.Otolaryngol Clin North Am. 2012 Feb;45(1):129-40. doi: 10.1016/j.otc.2011.08.021. Otolaryngol Clin North Am. 2012. PMID: 22115686 Review.
Cited by
-
Cochlear-implant Mandarin tone recognition with a disyllabic word corpus.Front Psychol. 2022 Oct 17;13:1026116. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1026116. eCollection 2022. Front Psychol. 2022. PMID: 36324794 Free PMC article.
-
A Preliminary Study of the Effects of Attentive Music Listening on Cochlear Implant Users' Speech Perception, Quality of Life, and Behavioral and Objective Measures of Frequency Change Detection.Front Hum Neurosci. 2020 Mar 31;14:110. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2020.00110. eCollection 2020. Front Hum Neurosci. 2020. PMID: 32296318 Free PMC article.
-
Music Perception, Appreciation, and Participation in Postlingually Deafened Adults and Cochlear Implant Users: A Systematic Literature Review.Trends Hear. 2024 Jan-Dec;28:23312165241287391. doi: 10.1177/23312165241287391. Trends Hear. 2024. PMID: 39582273 Free PMC article.
-
Child implant users' imitation of happy- and sad-sounding speech.Front Psychol. 2013 Jun 21;4:351. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00351. eCollection 2013. Front Psychol. 2013. PMID: 23801976 Free PMC article.
-
Contour identification with pitch and loudness cues using cochlear implants.J Acoust Soc Am. 2014 Jan;135(1):EL8-14. doi: 10.1121/1.4832915. J Acoust Soc Am. 2014. PMID: 24437857 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical