This site needs JavaScript to work properly. Please enable it to take advantage of the complete set of features!

Skip to main page content

Add to Collections

Your saved search

Name of saved search:

Search terms:

Test search terms

Would you like email updates of new search results?

Yes
No

Email: (change)

Frequency:

Which day?

Which day?

Report format:

Send at most:

Send even when there aren't any new results

Optional text in email:

Your RSS Feed

Comment

. 2010 Nov;31(6):507.

doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2010.07.013. Epub 2010 Jul 30.

A relevant question for site balanced studies relates to the comparative predictability of minimization to the alternative of permuted blocks

Damian McEntegart

PMID: 20674773
DOI: 10.1016/j.cct.2010.07.013

Comment

A relevant question for site balanced studies relates to the comparative predictability of minimization to the alternative of permuted blocks

Damian McEntegart. Contemp Clin Trials. 2010 Nov.

. 2010 Nov;31(6):507.

doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2010.07.013. Epub 2010 Jul 30.

Author

Damian McEntegart

PMID: 20674773
DOI: 10.1016/j.cct.2010.07.013

No abstract available

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment on

Minimization, by its nature, precludes allocation concealment, and invites selection bias.
Berger VW. Berger VW. Contemp Clin Trials. 2010 Sep;31(5):406. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2010.05.001. Epub 2010 May 10. Contemp Clin Trials. 2010. PMID: 20457277 Free PMC article. No abstract available.

Similar articles

Quantification methods were developed for selection bias by predictability of allocations with unequal block randomization.
Dupin-Spriet T, Fermanian J, Spriet A. Dupin-Spriet T, et al. J Clin Epidemiol. 2005 Dec;58(12):1269-76. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2005.04.008. J Clin Epidemiol. 2005. PMID: 16291471
Misguided precedent is not a reason to use permuted blocks.
Berger VW. Berger VW. Headache. 2006 Jul-Aug;46(7):1210-2. doi: 10.1111/j.1526-4610.2006.00517_2.x. Headache. 2006. PMID: 16866731 No abstract available.
New algorithm for treatment allocation reduced selection bias and loss of power in small trials.
Hofmeijer J, Anema PC, van der Tweel I. Hofmeijer J, et al. J Clin Epidemiol. 2008 Feb;61(2):119-24. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2007.04.002. Epub 2007 Aug 23. J Clin Epidemiol. 2008. PMID: 18177784
Pseudo cluster randomization dealt with selection bias and contamination in clinical trials.
Teerenstra S, Melis RJ, Peer PG, Borm GF. Teerenstra S, et al. J Clin Epidemiol. 2006 Apr;59(4):381-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2005.10.003. Epub 2006 Feb 14. J Clin Epidemiol. 2006. PMID: 16549260 Review.
Randomization procedures in orthopaedic trials.
Randelli P, Arrigoni P, Lubowitz JH, Cabitza P, Denti M. Randelli P, et al. Arthroscopy. 2008 Jul;24(7):834-8. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2008.01.011. Epub 2008 Mar 21. Arthroscopy. 2008. PMID: 18589273 Review.

See all similar articles

Cited by

Quantitative comparison of randomization designs in sequential clinical trials based on treatment balance and allocation randomness.
Zhao W, Weng Y, Wu Q, Palesch Y. Zhao W, et al. Pharm Stat. 2012 Jan-Feb;11(1):39-48. doi: 10.1002/pst.493. Epub 2011 May 5. Pharm Stat. 2012. PMID: 21544929 Free PMC article.
Randomization procedures for multicomponent behavioral intervention factorial trials in the multiphase optimization strategy framework: challenges and recommendations.
Gallis JA, Bennett GG, Steinberg DM, Askew S, Turner EL. Gallis JA, et al. Transl Behav Med. 2019 Nov 25;9(6):1047-1056. doi: 10.1093/tbm/iby131. Transl Behav Med. 2019. PMID: 30590759 Free PMC article.

Publication types

Actions
Actions

MeSH terms

Actions
Actions
Actions
Actions
Actions

LinkOut - more resources

Full Text Sources
- ClinicalKey
- Elsevier Science