Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2011 Feb;68(1):3-33.
doi: 10.1177/1077558710372810. Epub 2010 Jul 30.

Use of qualitative methods in published health services and management research: a 10-year review

Affiliations
Review

Use of qualitative methods in published health services and management research: a 10-year review

Bryan J Weiner et al. Med Care Res Rev. 2011 Feb.

Abstract

Over the past 10 years, the field of health services and management research has seen renewed interest in the use of qualitative research methods. This article examines the volume and characteristics of qualitative research articles published in nine major health services and management journals between 1998 and 2008. Qualitative research articles comprise 9% of research articles published in these journals. Although the publication rate of qualitative research articles has not kept pace with that of quantitative research articles, citation analysis suggests that qualitative research articles contribute comparably to the field's knowledge base. A wide range of policy and management topics has been examined using qualitative methods. Case study designs, interviews, and documentary sources were the most frequently used methods. Half of qualitative research articles provided little or no detail about key aspects the study's methods. Implications are discussed and recommendations are offered for promoting the publication of qualitative research.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declaration of Conflicting Interests

The authors declared no conflicts of interest with respect to the authorship and/or publication of this article.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Schema of literature search
*Results section reports 3,331 quantitative articles reflecting addition of 23 quantitative articles from Stage I reliability check, the subtraction of 5 qualitative articles from Stage II reliability check, and the addition of 9 articles from Stage III full-text review.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Frequency of research articles using qualitative and quantitative methods, by year
Figure 3
Figure 3
Distribution of 329 qualitative research articles, by journal (1998–2008)

Comment in

References

    1. Barr JK, Giannotti TE, Sofaer S, Duquette CE, Waters WJ, Petrillo MK. Using public reports of patient satisfaction for hospital quality improvement. Health Services Research. 2006;41:663–682. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Beaton DE, Clark JP. Qualitative research: A review of methods with use of examples from the total knee replacement literature. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery– American Volume. 2009;91A:107–112. - PubMed
    1. Berwick DM. Disseminating innovations in health care. Journal of the American Medical Association. 2003;289:1969–1975. - PubMed
    1. Best RG, Hysong SJ, Pugh JA, Ghosh S, Moore FI. Task overlap among primary care team members: An opportunity for system redesign? Journal of Healthcare Management. 2006;51:295–306. - PubMed
    1. Bradley EH, Curry LA, Devers KJ. Qualitative data analysis for health services research: Developing taxonomy, themes, and theory. Health Services Research. 2007;42:1758–1772. - PMC - PubMed