Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2011 Feb;22(2):383-9.
doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdq361. Epub 2010 Jul 30.

Clinical validation of an autoantibody test for lung cancer

Affiliations

Clinical validation of an autoantibody test for lung cancer

P Boyle et al. Ann Oncol. 2011 Feb.

Abstract

Background: Autoantibodies may be present in a variety of underlying cancers several years before tumours can be detected and testing for their presence may allow earlier diagnosis. We report the clinical validation of an autoantibody panel in newly diagnosed patients with lung cancer (LC).

Patients and methods: Three cohorts of patients with newly diagnosed LC were identified: group 1 (n = 145), group 2 (n = 241) and group 3 (n = 269). Patients were individually matched by gender, age and smoking history to a control individual with no history of malignant disease. Serum samples were obtained after diagnosis but before any anticancer treatment. Autoantibody levels were measured against a panel of six tumour-related antigens (p53, NY-ESO-1, CAGE, GBU4-5, Annexin 1 and SOX2). Assay sensitivity was tested in relation to demographic variables and cancer type/stage.

Results: The autoantibody panel demonstrated a sensitivity/specificity of 36%/91%, 39%/89% and 37%/90% in groups 1, 2 and 3, respectively, with good reproducibility. There was no significant difference between different LC stages, indicating that the antigens included covered the different types of LC well.

Conclusion: This assay confirms the value of an autoantibody panel as a diagnostic tool and offers a potential system for monitoring patients at high risk of LC.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Forest plot showing the sensitivity at a fixed 90% specificity by patient demographics, tumour characteristics and lung cancer stage. Line shows unadjusted sensitivity of 37% (all stages of cancers) in group 3 (n = 269). NSCLC, non-small-cell lung cancer; SCLC, small-cell lung cancer.

References

    1. Boyle P, Levin B, editors. World Cancer Report 2008. Lyon, France: IARC; 2008.
    1. Horner MJ, Ries LAG, Krapcho M, et al., editors. SEER Cancer Statistics Review, 1975–2006. Bethesda, MD: National Cancer Institute; 2009. http://seer.cancer.gov/csr/1975_2006/, based on November 2008 SEER data submission, posted to the SEER website (February 2010, date last accessed)
    1. Sone S, Takashima S, Li F, et al. Mass screening for lung cancer with mobile spiral computed tomography scanner. Lancet. 1998;351:1242–1245. - PubMed
    1. Henschke CI, McCauley DI, Yankelevitz DF, Altorki NK. Early lung cancer action project: overall design and findings from baseline screening. Lancet. 1999;354:99–105. - PubMed
    1. Swensen SJ, Jett JR, Hartman TE, et al. CT screening for lung cancer: five-year prospective experience. Radiology. 2005;235:259–265. - PubMed

Publication types