Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2010 Jun 1;324(1-2):141-145.
doi: 10.1016/j.molcata.2010.03.030.

Quantum Molecular Interaction Field Models of Substrate Enantioselection in Asymmetric Processes

Affiliations

Quantum Molecular Interaction Field Models of Substrate Enantioselection in Asymmetric Processes

Marisa C Kozlowski et al. J Mol Catal A Chem. .

Abstract

Computational models correlating substrate structure to enantioselection with asymmetric catalysts using the QMQSAR program are described. In addition to rapidly providing predictions that could be used to facilitate the screening of catalysts for novel substrates, the QMQSAR program identifies the portions of the substrate that most directly influence the enantioselectivity. The lack underlying relationship between all the substrates in one case, requires two quantitative structure selectivity relationships (QSSR) models to describe all of the experimental results.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Cross validation results of substrates from entries 1–11 (Table 1): Plot of predictions from leave-one-out models constructed from the 10 remaining substrates (y = 0.85x + 0.30, r2LOO = 0.67, CC = 0.82)
Figure 2
Figure 2
Superposition of the EPF points from the 11 leave-one-out models around the 11 aldehyde substrates listed in Table 1 (blue = positive EFP value correlates to higher ee, red = positive EFP value correlates to lower ee).
Figure 3
Figure 3
Cross validation results of substrates from entries 1–10 (Table 2): Plot of predictions from leave-one-out models constructed from the 9 remaining substrates (y = 0.82x + 0.01, r2LOO = 0.61, CCLOO = 0.77)
Figure 4
Figure 4
Cross validation results of substrates from entries 11–20 (Table 2): Plot of predictions from leave-one-out models constructed from the 9 remaining substrates (y = 0.89x + 0.38, r2LOO = 0.61, CCLOO = 0.78)

References

    1. Houk KN, Cheong PHY. Nature. 2008;455:309. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Brown JM, Deeth RJ. Angew Chem Int Ed. 2009;48:4476. - PubMed
    1. For the first QSSR work in a selective reaction, see: Oslob JD, Åkermark B, Helquist P, Norrby PO. Organometallics. 1997;16:3015.

    1. Sigman MS, Miller JJ. J Org Chem. 2009;74:7633. - PubMed
    1. Kozlowski MC, Dixon S, Panda M, Lauri G. J Am Chem Soc. 2003;125:6614. - PubMed