Bonded orthodontic retainers: a comparison of initial bond strength of different wire-and-composite combinations
- PMID: 20676816
- DOI: 10.1007/s00056-010-9947-5
Bonded orthodontic retainers: a comparison of initial bond strength of different wire-and-composite combinations
Abstract
Objectives: The aim of this in-vitro study was to evaluate initial bond strength in Newton (N) of two types of wires (Ortho- Flextech chain and Penta-One Coaxial wire 0.0215") bonded with three lingual retainer composites (FlowTain, Light Cure Retainer and Transbond LR).
Materials and methods: One hundred and eighty sound, extracted human premolars were randomly divided into six equal groups. One of the two types of lingual retainer wires was bonded with one of the three types of the composite material in each group. Initial bond strength was measured using an Instron universal testing machine. We also evaluated the failure characteristics after failure at maximum load using an optical microscope.
Results: Our findings demonstrated that the Coaxial/Transbond LR group was statistically significantly stronger than the other combinations. Statistically, 0.0215" Coaxial wire provided significantly stronger bond strength than Ortho-Flextech chain, and when the three composite systems were compared, Transbond LR revealed significantly higher bond strength than the others. However, Transbond LR left significantly more resin on the enamel surface after bond failure.
Conclusion: Significant differences exist between different combinations of wires and lingual retainer composites; however, all the wire-and-composite combinations we tested possess sufficient bond strength for clinical application.
Similar articles
-
Tensile test and interface retention forces between wires and composites in lingual fixed retainers.Int Orthod. 2015 Jun;13(2):210-220. doi: 10.1016/j.ortho.2015.03.009. Epub 2015 May 21. Int Orthod. 2015. PMID: 26003122 English, French.
-
Adhesive properties of bonded orthodontic retainers to enamel: stainless steel wire vs fiber-reinforced composites.J Adhes Dent. 2009 Oct;11(5):381-90. J Adhes Dent. 2009. PMID: 19841765 Clinical Trial.
-
The effect of prior sandblasting of the wire on the shear bond strength of two different types of lingual retainers.Int Orthod. 2018 Jun;16(2):294-303. doi: 10.1016/j.ortho.2018.03.001. Epub 2018 Apr 7. Int Orthod. 2018. PMID: 29631817
-
Shear bond strength of different fixed orthodontic retainers.Aust Orthod J. 2015 Nov;31(2):178-83. Aust Orthod J. 2015. PMID: 26999891
-
Resin-modified glass ionomer cements for bonding orthodontic retainers.Eur J Orthod. 2010 Jun;32(3):254-8. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjp066. Epub 2009 Sep 30. Eur J Orthod. 2010. PMID: 19793779 Clinical Trial.
Cited by
-
Shear Bond Strength of Four Types of Orthodontic Retainers after Thermocycling and Cyclic Loading.Int J Dent. 2021 Jun 30;2021:9424040. doi: 10.1155/2021/9424040. eCollection 2021. Int J Dent. 2021. PMID: 34306084 Free PMC article.
-
Pre-fabricated chain retainers as an alternative to traditional retainers.J Dent Sci. 2024 Jan;19(1):148-153. doi: 10.1016/j.jds.2023.05.020. Epub 2023 May 28. J Dent Sci. 2024. PMID: 38303849 Free PMC article.
-
Preparation of Nano-Apatite Grafted Glass-Fiber-Reinforced Composites for Orthodontic Application: Mechanical and In Vitro Biofilm Analysis.Materials (Basel). 2022 May 13;15(10):3504. doi: 10.3390/ma15103504. Materials (Basel). 2022. PMID: 35629533 Free PMC article.
-
Impact of bonding protocols and physical-mechanical properties of composite on durability and failure rate of fixed orthodontic retainers: a systematic review of laboratory studies.BMC Oral Health. 2025 Jul 26;25(1):1255. doi: 10.1186/s12903-025-06635-6. BMC Oral Health. 2025. PMID: 40713668 Free PMC article.
-
Upper bonded retainers.Angle Orthod. 2011 Nov;81(6):1050-6. doi: 10.2319/022211-132.1. Epub 2011 Jun 9. Angle Orthod. 2011. PMID: 21657830 Free PMC article.
References
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical