Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2010 Jul;71(4):300-7.
doi: 10.1007/s00056-010-1015-7. Epub 2010 Jul 30.

Lower bonded retainers: survival and failure rates particularly considering operator experience

[Article in English, German]
Affiliations

Lower bonded retainers: survival and failure rates particularly considering operator experience

[Article in English, German]
Katharina Scheibe et al. J Orofac Orthop. 2010 Jul.

Abstract

Objective: The aim of this study was to retrospectively assess the frequency and type of lower bonded retainer failures and to analyze the possible influence of operator experience.

Patients and methods: The records of 1062 patients with lower bonded retainers were analyzed with respect to retainer type and failure, timing of failure and differences among operators.

Results: 34.9% of all patients experienced retainer failure. Cuspid retainers with two bonding sites failed significantly less often than multiple teeth retainers with six bonding sites. One or more bonding sites became detached in 22.8% of the patients, 17.9% had at least one total retainer loss, while only 0.8% of the patients suffered from retainer fractures. Experienced orthodontists exhibited significantly fewer failures than postgraduate students.

Conclusions: The present cohort presented a relatively high failure rate of 34.9%. Lower bonded cuspid retainers failed somewhat less often than 3-3 retainers. In addition less operator experience was likely to correlate with a higher failure rate.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1995 Aug;108(2):207-13 - PubMed
    1. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1999 Mar;115(3):300-4 - PubMed
    1. J Orofac Orthop. 2000;61(5):352-8 - PubMed
    1. Eur J Orthod. 1997 Oct;19(5):501-9 - PubMed
    1. J Orthod. 2006 Sep;33(3):205-12 - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources