Lower bonded retainers: survival and failure rates particularly considering operator experience
- PMID: 20676817
- DOI: 10.1007/s00056-010-1015-7
Lower bonded retainers: survival and failure rates particularly considering operator experience
Abstract
Objective: The aim of this study was to retrospectively assess the frequency and type of lower bonded retainer failures and to analyze the possible influence of operator experience.
Patients and methods: The records of 1062 patients with lower bonded retainers were analyzed with respect to retainer type and failure, timing of failure and differences among operators.
Results: 34.9% of all patients experienced retainer failure. Cuspid retainers with two bonding sites failed significantly less often than multiple teeth retainers with six bonding sites. One or more bonding sites became detached in 22.8% of the patients, 17.9% had at least one total retainer loss, while only 0.8% of the patients suffered from retainer fractures. Experienced orthodontists exhibited significantly fewer failures than postgraduate students.
Conclusions: The present cohort presented a relatively high failure rate of 34.9%. Lower bonded cuspid retainers failed somewhat less often than 3-3 retainers. In addition less operator experience was likely to correlate with a higher failure rate.
Similar articles
-
Upper bonded retainers.Angle Orthod. 2011 Nov;81(6):1050-6. doi: 10.2319/022211-132.1. Epub 2011 Jun 9. Angle Orthod. 2011. PMID: 21657830 Free PMC article.
-
Bonded retainers--clinical reliability.J Orofac Orthop. 2000;61(5):352-8. doi: 10.1007/pl00001905. J Orofac Orthop. 2000. PMID: 11037687 English, German.
-
Indirect vs direct bonding of mandibular fixed retainers in orthodontic patients: Comparison of retainer failures and posttreatment stability. A 2-year follow-up of a single-center randomized controlled trial.Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2017 Jan;151(1):15-27. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2016.09.009. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2017. PMID: 28024770 Clinical Trial.
-
Epidemiologic study of orthodontic retention procedures.Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2018 Apr;153(4):496-504. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2017.08.013. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2018. PMID: 29602341 Review.
-
Lower fixed retainers: bonded on all teeth or only on canines? A systematic review.Angle Orthod. 2020 Jan;90(1):125-143. doi: 10.2319/013019-63.1. Epub 2019 Sep 19. Angle Orthod. 2020. PMID: 31536378 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
Clinical factors affecting the longevity of fixed retainers and the influence of fixed retainers on periodontal health in periodontitis patients: a retrospective study.J Periodontal Implant Sci. 2021 Jun;51(3):163-178. doi: 10.5051/jpis.2003140157. J Periodontal Implant Sci. 2021. PMID: 34114380 Free PMC article.
-
Survival of maxillary and mandibular bonded retainers 10 to 15 years after orthodontic treatment: a retrospective observational study.Prog Orthod. 2019 Jul 22;20(1):28. doi: 10.1186/s40510-019-0279-8. Prog Orthod. 2019. PMID: 31328248 Free PMC article.
-
A Comparative Assessment of Three Mandibular Retention Protocols: A Prospective Cohort Study.Oral Health Prev Dent. 2022 Mar 14;20:77-84. doi: 10.3290/j.ohpd.b2805357. Oral Health Prev Dent. 2022. PMID: 35285595 Free PMC article.
-
Comparison of survival rate and duration of maxillary and mandibular lingual bonded retainers - a retrospective cohort study.BMC Oral Health. 2025 Jul 2;25(1):1048. doi: 10.1186/s12903-025-06314-6. BMC Oral Health. 2025. PMID: 40604851 Free PMC article.
-
Twelve-year follow-up of mandibular incisor stability: Comparison between two bonded lingual orthodontic retainers.Angle Orthod. 2017 Mar;87(2):200-208. doi: 10.2319/031716-227.1. Epub 2016 Aug 23. Angle Orthod. 2017. PMID: 27552722 Free PMC article.
References
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources