[Standardized reconstruction of acetabular bone defects using the cranial socket system]
- PMID: 20676819
- DOI: 10.1007/s00064-010-9003-z
[Standardized reconstruction of acetabular bone defects using the cranial socket system]
Abstract
Objective: Management of primary or secondary acetabular bone loss (D'Antonio type I-IV ). Implantation and stable fixation using a cementless, cranially extended oval press-fit cup to restore painless joint function and loading capacity.
Indications: Septic or aseptic loosening of the acetabular component after total hip arthroplasty. Acetabular bone loss after tumor resection. Primary acetabular bone defects in developmental dysplasia of the hip.
Contraindications: Persistent deep infection. Bone defects including the parts of the iliac bone adjoining the sacrum (fixation of the stem in the ilium is not possible any more).
Surgical technique: Complete exposure of the acetabular defect using a standard approach. Removal of the loose cup. Excision of soft and granulation tissue from the acetabular ground and the rim. Reaming of the acetabulum with sequentially larger hemispheric reamers until an adequate bony bed is created for the insertion of the cranial socket. Eccentric cranial sockets without a craniolateral flap are preferable for use in type I and II defects with teardrop lysis mostly involving the craniolateral acetabulum, if a trihedral press-fit fixation can be achieved. Supplementary screw fixation through the acetabular ground, is possible. If a type III defect is present, the authors recommend the use of cranial sockets with an anatomic flap in order to increase primary stability by supplementary screw fixation. This is especially recommended for the management of deficiencies in the medial or posterior wall. If there is pelvic discontinuity (type IV), adequate acetabular reconstruction with primary stability of the component can only be achieved by a supplementary intramedullary structured stem fixed in the dorsal part of the ilium.
Postoperative management: Partial loading of the operated limb with 10 kg for a period of 6-12 weeks. Then increased loading with 10 kg per week. Thrombosis prophylaxis until full weight bearing. Physiotherapy and gait training.
Results: A total of 50 cup revisions using the ESKA cranial socket system were clinically and radiologically analyzed with an average follow-up of 65.7+/-28.5 months (26-123 months). Defects were classified according to D'Antonio. There were 21 type II, 23 type III, and six type IV defects. The Harris Hip Score increased from 40 preoperatively to 68.3 points postoperatively. Four patients had recurrent hip dislocation requiring replacement of the inlay. In four cases of aseptic loosening, the acetabular component had to be revised. With revision of the acetabular component as an endpoint, implant survival was 92% after an average of 5.4 years.
Similar articles
-
[Reconstruction of large acetabular defects using trabecular metal augments].Oper Orthop Traumatol. 2010 Jul;22(3):268-77. doi: 10.1007/s00064-010-8026-9. Oper Orthop Traumatol. 2010. PMID: 20676821 German.
-
[Exchange of acetabular cups with severe bone defects using antiprotrusion cages].Oper Orthop Traumatol. 2010 Jul;22(3):256-67. doi: 10.1007/s00064-010-8025-x. Oper Orthop Traumatol. 2010. PMID: 20676820 German.
-
[Biological acetabular defect reconstruction in revision hip arthroplasty using impaction bone grafting and an acetabular reconstruction ring].Oper Orthop Traumatol. 2014 Apr;26(2):126-40. doi: 10.1007/s00064-013-0270-3. Epub 2014 Apr 3. Oper Orthop Traumatol. 2014. PMID: 24691908 Clinical Trial. German.
-
[Operative treatment of T-type fractures of the acetabulum via surgical hip dislocation or Stoppa approach].Oper Orthop Traumatol. 2009 Sep;21(3):251-69. doi: 10.1007/s00064-009-1803-7. Oper Orthop Traumatol. 2009. PMID: 19779682 Review. German.
-
[Acetabular metastatic defect reconstruction using the modular revision support cup MRS-C].Oper Orthop Traumatol. 2024 Apr;36(2):145-156. doi: 10.1007/s00064-023-00834-6. Epub 2023 Nov 3. Oper Orthop Traumatol. 2024. PMID: 37921888 Free PMC article. Review. German.
Cited by
-
[Partial pelvic resection (internal hemipelvectomy) and endoprosthetic replacement in periacetabular tumors].Oper Orthop Traumatol. 2012 Jul;24(3):196-214. doi: 10.1007/s00064-012-0161-z. Oper Orthop Traumatol. 2012. PMID: 22743633 Clinical Trial. German.
-
Acetabular defects in revision hip arthroplasty: a therapy-oriented classification.Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2020 Jun;140(6):815-825. doi: 10.1007/s00402-020-03379-6. Epub 2020 Feb 25. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2020. PMID: 32100108 Free PMC article.
-
Acetabular defect management and revision arthroplasty via the direct anterior approach.Oper Orthop Traumatol. 2022 Jun;34(3):203-217. doi: 10.1007/s00064-022-00767-6. Epub 2022 Jun 9. Oper Orthop Traumatol. 2022. PMID: 35680676 English.
-
[Revision arthroplasty of the hip: acetabular component].Chirurg. 2010 Apr;81(4):284-92. doi: 10.1007/s00104-009-1845-2. Chirurg. 2010. PMID: 20232028 German.
-
[Treatment of acetabular bone defects in revision hip arthroplasty using the Revisio-System].Orthopade. 2017 Feb;46(2):126-132. doi: 10.1007/s00132-016-3375-1. Orthopade. 2017. PMID: 28012061 German.
References
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical