Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 1991 Jun;82(6):387-94.

[An open comparative study of sulbactam/ampicillin vs mezlocillin in adult and pediatric patients. Efficacy and tolerability]

[Article in Italian]
Affiliations
  • PMID: 2067712
Clinical Trial

[An open comparative study of sulbactam/ampicillin vs mezlocillin in adult and pediatric patients. Efficacy and tolerability]

[Article in Italian]
F Chiodo et al. Minerva Med. 1991 Jun.

Abstract

Sulbactam is a beta-lactamase inhibitor that, when combined with ampicillin, extends its antibacterial activity against beta-lactamases producing organisms. The clinical efficacy and safety of the sulbactam/ampicillin (S/A) combination versus mezlocillin (M), was assessed in a prospective comparative randomised study. Sixty-five patients (12 children), with lower respiratory tract infections (40), UTIs (20), and skin/soft tissue infections (5), were treated with S/A (32) or M (33 patients), given IV or IM. The two treatment groups did not significantly differ in types of infection, infecting organisms, and severity of underlying disease. Explicit criteria were used to define infections, clinical response, local and systemic tolerability, and adverse effects. A total of 33 organisms were isolated; 3/33 were resistant to S/A, 7/33 to M, and 15/33 to A alone. A successful clinical outcome (cure + improvement), was obtained in 29 out of 30 assessable patients in the S/A group, and in 30/31 in the M group. Both treatments resulted 100% effective in eradicating infecting pathogens: this confirms their high bactericidal activity, also against bacterial species showing remarkable antibiotic resistance patterns, and in variously immunocompromised hosts. Both S/A and M; therapeutic courses were well tolerated; only four out of the 61 assessable patients (2 in S/A, and 2 in M group), experimented mild, transient side-effects, that did not require modification of the treatment regimens. We conclude that both S/A and M appeared very safe and effective drugs; in regard to clinical and microbiological effectiveness and local and systemic tolerability, no statistically significant differences (p greater than 0.05) between the two groups were observed, in treating various bacterial infections, in both adult and paediatric age.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

LinkOut - more resources