[Application of predictive model to estimate concentrations of chemical substances in the work environment]
- PMID: 20677430
[Application of predictive model to estimate concentrations of chemical substances in the work environment]
Abstract
Background: Based on the Estimation and Assessment of Substance Exposure (EASE) predictive model implemented into the European Union System for the Evaluation of Substances (EUSES 2.1.), the exposure to three chosen organic solvents: toluene, ethyl acetate and acetone was estimated and compared with the results of measurements in workplaces.
Material and methods: Prior to validation, the EASE model was pretested using three exposure scenarios. The scenarios differed in the decision tree of pattern of use. Five substances were chosen for the test: 1,4-dioxane tert-methyl-butyl ether, diethylamine, 1,1,1-trichloroethane and bisphenol A. After testing the EASE model, the next step was the validation by estimating the exposure level and comparing it with the results of measurements in the workplace. We used the results of measurements of toluene, ethyl acetate and acetone concentrations in the work environment of a paint and lacquer factory, a shoe factory and a refinery. Three types of exposure scenarios, adaptable to the description of working conditions were chosen to estimate inhalation exposure.
Results: Comparison of calculated exposure to toluene, ethyl acetate and acetone with measurements in workplaces showed that model predictions are comparable with the measurement results. Only for low concentration ranges, the measured concentrations were higher than those predicted.
Conclusions: EASE is a clear, consistent system, which can be successfully used as an additional component of inhalation exposure estimation. If the measurement data are available, they should be preferred to values estimated from models. In addition to inhalation exposure estimation, the EASE model makes it possible not only to assess exposure-related risk but also to predict workers' dermal exposure.
Similar articles
-
Evaluation of the TRA ECETOC model for inhalation workplace exposure to different organic solvents for selected process categories.Int J Occup Med Environ Health. 2011 Jun;24(2):208-17. doi: 10.2478/s13382-011-0021-3. Epub 2011 May 2. Int J Occup Med Environ Health. 2011. PMID: 21537889
-
Comparison of measured dermal dust exposures with predicted exposures given by the EASE expert system.Ann Occup Hyg. 2005 Mar;49(2):111-23. doi: 10.1093/annhyg/meh089. Ann Occup Hyg. 2005. PMID: 15734824
-
Do EASE scenarios fit workplace reality? A validation study of the EASE model. Estimation and Assessment of Substance Exposure.Appl Occup Environ Hyg. 2001 Feb;16(2):182-7. doi: 10.1080/104732201460316. Appl Occup Environ Hyg. 2001. PMID: 11217709
-
Comparative evaluation of absorbed dose estimates derived from passive dosimetry measurements to those derived from biological monitoring: validation of exposure monitoring methodologies.J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol. 2008 Mar;18(2):211-30. doi: 10.1038/sj.jes.7500591. Epub 2007 Jun 27. J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol. 2008. PMID: 17593947 Review.
-
Assessing workplace chemical exposures: the role of exposure monitoring.J Environ Monit. 2004 May;6(5):404-12. doi: 10.1039/b314697a. Epub 2004 Mar 11. J Environ Monit. 2004. PMID: 15152307 Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Medical