Dose- and age-dependent ectopic pregnancy risks with intrauterine contraception
- PMID: 2067778
Dose- and age-dependent ectopic pregnancy risks with intrauterine contraception
Abstract
Analyses of randomized trials of copper intrauterine devices (IUDs) substantiate three hypotheses: 1) Ratios of ectopic to total pregnancies conceived during copper IUD use did not differ among devices; 2) pregnancy rates per 1000 woman-years varied inversely with copper surface area; and 3) ectopic pregnancy rates consequently varied inversely by copper surface area. Randomized trials also demonstrated that progestin-only IUDs had a markedly higher ratio of ectopic to total pregnancies, 171 per 1000, than did copper IUDs, at 39 per 1000 (P less than .001). Ectopic pregnancy rates per 1000 woman-years with progestin-only IUDs varied inversely with dose, notably for levonorgestrel-releasing devices. In a large United States IUD cohort study, ectopic pregnancy ratios of copper IUDs varied significantly (P less than .05) with age, as they do in the general population. Copper and non-medicated IUDs in the United States and the United Kingdom had age-specific ectopic pregnancy ratios six times those of non-contraceptors in the United States population during 1970-1978. The estimated rate of ectopic pregnancy for users of IUDs having 200 mm2 of copper was four-tenths that of non-contraceptors in the United States during 1970-1978. For users of devices with 350 mm2 or more of copper, ectopic pregnancy rates were one-tenth those of non-contraceptors. Rates for users of devices releasing 65 micrograms/day of progesterone are estimated to have been 50-80% above those of non-contraceptors. Devices releasing 20 micrograms/day of levonorgestrel have had ectopic pregnancy rates estimated to be 0.1 of those of non-contraceptors. Most IUDs protect against ectopic pregnancy.
Similar articles
-
Intrauterine devices: an effective alternative to oral hormonal contraception.Prescrire Int. 2009 Jun;18(101):125-30. Prescrire Int. 2009. PMID: 19637436
-
[IUDs and ectopic pregnancy].Contracept Fertil Sex (Paris). 1983 Dec;11(12):1287-94. Contracept Fertil Sex (Paris). 1983. PMID: 12312723 French.
-
Intrauterine devices.Contemp Rev Obstet Gynaecol. 1992 Oct;4(4):215-22. Contemp Rev Obstet Gynaecol. 1992. PMID: 12345158
-
Contraceptive devices: intravaginal and intrauterine delivery systems.Expert Rev Med Devices. 2008 Sep;5(5):639-54. doi: 10.1586/17434440.5.5.639. Expert Rev Med Devices. 2008. PMID: 18803474 Review.
-
Intrauterine devices. The optimal long-term contraceptive method?J Reprod Med. 1999 Mar;44(3):269-74. J Reprod Med. 1999. PMID: 10202746 Review.
Cited by
-
Understanding benefits and addressing misperceptions and barriers to intrauterine device access among populations in the United States.Patient Prefer Adherence. 2014 Jul 3;8:947-57. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S45710. eCollection 2014. Patient Prefer Adherence. 2014. PMID: 25050062 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Spontaneous abortion and ectopic pregnancy: Case definition & guidelines for data collection, analysis, and presentation of maternal immunization safety data.Vaccine. 2017 Dec 4;35(48 Pt A):6563-6574. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2017.01.047. Vaccine. 2017. PMID: 29150062 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Attitudes and practices related to intrauterine devices for nulliparous women among Chinese health care providers.Reprod Health. 2019 Jan 31;16(1):10. doi: 10.1186/s12978-019-0678-9. Reprod Health. 2019. PMID: 30704499 Free PMC article.
-
Benefit-risk assessment of the levonorgestrel intrauterine system in contraception.Drug Saf. 2004;27(15):1185-204. doi: 10.2165/00002018-200427150-00003. Drug Saf. 2004. PMID: 15588115
-
CT imaging of intrauterine devices (IUD): expected findings, unexpected findings, and complications.Abdom Radiol (NY). 2024 Jan;49(1):237-248. doi: 10.1007/s00261-023-04052-3. Epub 2023 Oct 31. Abdom Radiol (NY). 2024. PMID: 37907685 Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical