Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2010 Aug;119(3):491-501.
doi: 10.1037/a0019609.

Selective attention to affective stimuli and clinical depression among youths: role of anxiety and specificity of emotion

Benjamin L Hankin  1 , Brandon E Gibb, John R Z Abela, Kate Flory
Affiliations

Selective attention to affective stimuli and clinical depression among youths: role of anxiety and specificity of emotion

Benjamin L Hankin et al. J Abnorm Psychol. 2010 Aug.

Abstract

Cognitive models of psychopathology posit that the content or focus of information-processing biases (e.g., attentional biases) is disorder specific: Depression is hypothesized to be characterized by attentional biases specifically for depression-relevant stimuli (e.g., sad facial expressions), whereas anxiety should relate particularly to attentional biases to threat-relevant stimuli (e.g., angry faces). However, little research has investigated this specificity hypothesis and none with a sample of youths. The present study examined attentional biases to emotional faces (sad, angry, and happy compared with neutral) in groups of pure depressed, pure anxious, comorbid depressed and anxious, and control youths (ages 9-17 years; N = 161). Consistent with cognitive models, pure depressed and pure anxious youths exhibited attentional biases specifically to sad and angry faces, respectively, whereas comorbid youths exhibited attentional biases to both facial expressions. In addition, control youths exhibited attentional avoidance of sad faces, and comorbid boys avoided happy faces. Overall, findings suggest that cognitive biases and processing of particular emotional information are specific to pure clinical depression and anxiety, and results inform etiological models of potentially specific processes that are associated with internalizing disorders among youths.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Attentional bias for angry and sad faces as function of youth diagnostic groups.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Attentional bias to happy faces as a function of diagnostic group and sex
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Abela JRZ, Hankin BL. Cognitive vulnerability to depression in children and adolescents: A developmental psychopathology approach. In: Abela JRZ, Hankin BL, editors. Handbook of Child and Adolescent Depression. New York, NY: Guilford Press; 2008. pp. 35–78.
    1. Abela JRZ, Hankin BL. Rumination as a Vulnerability Factor to Depression during the Transition from Early to Middle Adolescence: A Multi-Wave Longitudinal Study. 2009 Manuscript submitted for publication. - PubMed
    1. Abramson LY, Alloy LB, Hankin BL, Haeffel GJ, MacCoon D, Gibb BE. Cognitive vulnerability-stress models of depression in a self-regulatory and psychobiological context. In: Gotlib IH, Hammen C, editors. Handbook of Depression. New York: The Guilford Press; 2002. pp. 295–313.
    1. American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders. 4. Washington, DC: Author; 1994.
    1. Angold A, Costello EJ, Erkanli A. Comorbidity. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry and Allied Disciplines. 1999;40:57–87. - PubMed

Publication types